pgetsos@kbin.social to Soccer@kbin.social · 1 year agoPremier League demanded extra assurances Chelsea were not owned by Saudi Arabiawww.telegraph.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up13arrow-down1external-linkPremier League demanded extra assurances Chelsea were not owned by Saudi Arabiawww.telegraph.co.ukpgetsos@kbin.social to Soccer@kbin.social · 1 year agomessage-square2fedilinkfile-text
Exclusive: New owners provided detailed information to Premier League who were satisfied there was no conflict of interest
minus-squaresalmacis@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoSo what happens if it’s found that Saudi Arabia do in fact own Chelsea? How does it work with Newcastle competing in the same league? I know the Saudis are claiming that Newcastle are not state-owned, but nobody actually believes that.
minus-squarelemonflavoured@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoProbably nothing because the Premier League and FA are spineless.
So what happens if it’s found that Saudi Arabia do in fact own Chelsea? How does it work with Newcastle competing in the same league? I know the Saudis are claiming that Newcastle are not state-owned, but nobody actually believes that.
Probably nothing because the Premier League and FA are spineless.