A man stabbed six people to death at a busy Sydney shopping center Saturday before he was fatally shot, police said, with hundreds fleeing the chaotic scene, many weeping as they carried their children. Eight people, including a 9-month-old, were injured.

New South Wales police said they believed a 40-year-old man was responsible for the Saturday afternoon attack at the Westfield Shopping Centre in Bondi Junction, in the city’s eastern suburbs and not far from the world-famous Bondi Beach. They said they were not able to name him until a formal identification had taken place but that they weren’t treating the attack as terrorism-related.

The man was shot dead by a police inspector after he turned and raised a knife, New South Wales Assistant Police Commissioner Anthony Cooke told reporters.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    180
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    It fucking sucks but thank fucking God they didn’t have an automatic weapon.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        There’s a large American population on lemmy, I know it’s a common view but thankfully it’s the minority one.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          71
          ·
          7 months ago

          No it’s not, the majority of Americans are ok owning firearms. The view that we shouldn’t be able to own firearms is a minority one and is more so prevalent on the Internet in echo chambers that lean left.

          Also, we made a comment because automatic weapons are basically non-existent here in the USA, which is something the anti-gun crowd continually is ignorant on.

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            There is a clear majority of Americans that don’t believe automatic weapons should be legal - generally America is pro hunting rifle (with the common impression those are akin to old bolt action or breech loading rifles in fire rate). The semi and fully automatic weapons poll unfavorably - especially handguns.

          • azertyfun@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            The anti-gun crowd is also ignorant of the practicalities of automatic vs semiautomatic. What they mean is “civilians shouldn’t have mostly unrestricted access to firearms, especially ones with no use for hunting” and getting hung up on technical minutia misses the point entirely.

            • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              No pretty sure most of them mean “ban guns”. I’ve seen too many “no one wants to take your guns” posts that followed with a “but…”

            • escaped_cruzader@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              mostly unrestricted access

              This only works to prevent mass shootings of opportunity, the planners just jump the necessary hoops

            • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              7 months ago

              “Unrestricted” is quite a leap, I have to pass background checks, and depending on state, there is a waiting period before I can take the firearm home. Concealed carry also requires classes with certificates and gun range proof with instructors, and FBI fingerprint check and storage in their database forever.

              • chakan2@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                That depends on your state…also depends on how close you live to an unregulated state.

    • jumjummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s so infuriating that people will use this as an example of “see, mass killings happen even without guns!1!1!!” without the logical step of “wow, that would have been so much worse with a gun!”.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      265
      ·
      8 months ago

      Why? Less people would have probably died. Automatics are stupid hard to shoot accurately. The military uses them for suppression even. They’re not designed to be accurate just to keep the enemy down.

      • Ixoid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        69
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Brainworms. Fuck your freedum bullshit, we don’t want or need your sick gun culture in Australia.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              37
              ·
              7 months ago

              Cool the UK said the same thing, and now they have bans on knives in public. Just as Australia has bans on paintball guns and airsoft. The Overton window keeps getting pushed to one extreme or the other.

              • Ixoid@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                21
                ·
                7 months ago

                Like flies on shit, you cunts turn up after every tragedy around the world, trying to convince us to have MORE death in society. You sicken me.

                • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  29
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  You do know more guns are in civilian hands in Australia now than before the 96 forced confiscation.

              • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                The UK has a violence problem - but that problem would be so much fucking worse if there were guns involved.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          44
          ·
          7 months ago

          You already have it. You now have more firearms in civilian hands than before the 1996 ban.

      • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        that’s why militaries around the world have lately switched to knifes as primary service weapons and trained their soldiers like the ninjas of old

        fucking brain rot

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          51
          ·
          7 months ago

          Where did I say anything like that? I was pointing out that automatic weapons have shit accuracy. It’s not my fault you can’t understand that.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Automatic weapons are used in “spray and pray” situations with large crowds.

        The Las Vegas shooter modified his weapons for automatic fire resulting in 60 deaths, 413 wounded, and a total of 867 injuries due to the panic.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Las_Vegas_shooting

        It stands as the deadliest mass shooting in US history. So, yeah, in a crowded situation, automatic weapons are far, far, worse.

      • Bremmy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        This might be the dumbest opinion I’ve ever read on here

      • taanegl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        What kind of absolute psycho needs to bring an automatic rifle to the mall? Mass shooters, that’s who.

        Your parents failed you.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          38
          ·
          7 months ago

          We don’t have automatic weapons available here. That’s how disconnected you all are from understanding the issues. Just as Republicans here want to ban abortion without knowing anything about women. You want to do the same with firearms without knowing anything about them.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            7 months ago

            It isn’t required to know every single random trivia fact about guns to know they are designed to kill people. None of us need perfect knowledge before we do anything. Do you have any inkling how crazy the physics/chemistry of fire is? No? Guess you have no opinion on your car catching on fire.

            And this is a bullshit comparison with abortion.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              No it’s basic knowledge, and it absolutely is akin to the abortion debate. You sound like that dumbass senator who said a woman’s body knows if it was a legit pregnancy or rape and can get rid of it if it’s rape. That’s the level of ignorance the majority of you anti-gun people have.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                7 months ago

                Please demonstrate your claim that the abortion debate and gun debate are the same.

                Nice personal attack btw. Really convinced me.

                • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  17
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I literally just did. The mass majority of users here and the mass majority of antigun people do not understand what they want legislated away. The same goes for prolife tools.

                  Where did I personally attack you?

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Tell me your only exposure to automatic weapons is Call of Duty without telling me.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          51
          ·
          7 months ago

          Lol ok sure. I own an automatic, it was stupid expensive and is wildly inaccurate. It’s a collection piece and barely gets used because of how silly it is

          Tell me again how little I know…you being antigun telling me that I don’t know about firearms is hilarious.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            32
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m a combat veteran. I’ve used semi/burst/and full weapons in combat.

            You’re full of shit.

                • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  31
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Never said I was. We really need a /r/justbootthings here on Lemmy. Your military experience doesn’t magically make you an expert. Usually it’s the opposite.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Probably because in a shopping mall you don’t need to be accurate in the slightest to kill others.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          41
          ·
          7 months ago

          You clearly haven’t shot an automatic firearm before. They’re wildly inaccurate and you literally cannot hit shit with them.

          • papertowels@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            7 months ago

            I definitely haven’t, lol. My assumption is this guy wouldn’t need to aim to hit folks in a shopping center, but that’s just a guess. Given that automatics are illegal where I’m from they’re kind of a mythical concept haha.

            I personally think I’m grateful this guy didn’t have a firearm of any sort. There’s a picture of a guy armed with a bollard having a standoff with him to protect his family. This would be a very different article if the slasher was armed even with a pistol.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              7 months ago

              You most definitely need to be aiming to hit moving targets with a firearm, automatics are wildly inaccurate because the rate of fire creates a ton of recoil which has the rounds go everywhere. On top of that a 30 round standard size magazine, lasts about 2 seconds.

              The reason semi-automatic hand guns are heavily used in 95% of murders in the USA is because they’re easier to aim at close range, concealable and easy to toss once they’ve been used.

              • papertowels@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                7 months ago

                What I’m saying is that depending on the shopping center, you could very easily “shoot everywhere” and still hit many people, for example, the bump stock fueled 2017 Vegas shooting.

                • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  15
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Yep but your odds of actually killing someone are lower than if you actually aimed and fired with a semi automatic.

                  Like I said in one of my other posts. There is a reason the military went to 3rnd burst and semi auto for their infantry rifles and SAWs used as suppression. Vietnam they found out that most soldiers would mag dump and not hit anything. So they went over to 3rnd burst and single shooting teaching the soldiers to fire deliberately when aiming to kill.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          49
          ·
          7 months ago

          Why because you don’t know whats the difference between semi-automatic and automatic?

          Automatics are designed to keep enemies suppressed, because of the level of accuracy they have.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              45
              ·
              7 months ago

              Ask the gang bangers in inner cities. Tons of giggle switches out there, but their homicide rate has dropped. Pointing to a lack of accuracy.

              • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                19
                ·
                7 months ago

                Wait, your argument is that these things are so inaccurate that within stabbing distance they still miss their target?

                • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  26
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Yup, injuries have climbed but deaths have dropped.

                  https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/03/21/chicago-glock-switch-lawsuit/

                  The 41-page complaint details dangerous and deadly incidents involving modified Glocks on the streets of Chicago in recent years, including police officers with department-issue Glock pistols facing off against criminals with machine-gun power. Bystanders and buildings have been struck by the bullet spray of modified Glocks, which cause a recoil that is difficult for unskilled or inexperienced users to control, the complaint alleges.

                  Even Chicago’s own lawsuit details how inaccurate they are.

              • papertowels@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                18
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Okay this is a blatant disregard for correlation vs causation, with a side of no shared data to boot.

        • sandman@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          38
          ·
          7 months ago

          Suppressive fire is to suppress the enemy, not kill them.

          You’re just proving his point that full-auto is inaccurate and unreliable for anything but suppressive fire.

            • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              Hold up, let me just check with a professional soldier real quick…

              Yeah, my wife says that in an urban combat situation like this (basically anything taking place in or around buildings, even a larger building like a mall), you almost certainly would be using full auto (if you have the option). At longer ranges however you would definitely switch to semi-automatic fire.

              That’s assuming you’re up against armed resistance and know what you’re doing, of course. If you’re the kind of coward who goes and murders a bunch of innocent strangers, any self-loading weapon is going to be significantly more dangerous than not having one at all, be it semi-automatic or fully-automatic.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        My wife is a reg-force infanteer. At the kind of distances you’re firing at inside of a shopping mall she could comfortably dump a ten round burst into a person’s torso and not miss a shot. Even an untrained shooter could easily land a lot of lethal hits if they were firing into a crowd. And yes, automatic fire is absolutely used in urban combat; at close ranges it is very easy to control a fully automatic weapon sufficiently for that. The standard strategy is to aim for the navel and let your fire carry up the torso; it’s known as “zippering”. When intentionally controlled by the shooter these weapons do not jump around anything like the way you’ve seen in video games.

        Also, generally full auto is not that great for suppressing fire, unless you’re talking about a machine gun. With an assault rifle you’re better off maintaining steady suppression in semi-auto. It’s not so much the volume of fire that keeps a target’s head down as it is the consistency. Dumping a whole mag and then stopping to reload gives them plenty of time to set up and start laying hate on your position. There are exceptions like Aussie Peel Out, but they’re rare. For the part talking guns is the way it’s done.

        That’s without even getting into the fact that saying “automatic weapon” doesn’t necessarily mean “fully automatic” (hence why the word “fully” is usually in there; if there wasn’t any ambiguity, why is it necessary to specify?). It’s much more likely that the previous commenter was referring to any form of self-loading weapon.

          • yuri@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            They actually directly refuted most of what you said in the comment they replied to. If you wanna pretend that you suddenly don’t believe all the shit in your initial comment, that’s cool, but don’t act like y’all have been on the same side this whole time lmao

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Got a source for it? Or you just another anti-gun who wants to say “fake news”.

          You can go look up why the military has 3 round burst and semi auto which is what they train most infantry on vs full auto. Be my guest.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Automatics are stupid hard to shoot accurately. The military uses them for suppression even.

        Why are they effective at suppression? Is it because if you don’t stay down you get shot?

      • sandman@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        You have a point.

        How many shootings do we see that have fewer victims than this?

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s all I think about whenever I hear about a sick fucko intent on killing.

        With a gun, the numbers would be significantly higher.

        • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I agree with all points, but isn’t the officer who stopped it from continuing the ‘good guy with a gun’ here?

          It’s almost like it’s possible to have good guys with guns without letting every single person get guns by default.

            • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              “The government has been captured by capitalists and does their bidding.”
              “Only the government should have guns.”

              This has always fascinated me.

          • MalachaiConstant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            I disagree with the idea that cops should be considered good or bad. They are state force applied. A cop can be a good person, but I think the whole point of the uniform is to remove the person from the position

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The attack at the shopping center, one of the country’s busiest and which was a hub of activity on a particularly warm fall afternoon, began around 3:10 p.m. and police were swiftly called.

    “This was a horrific act of violence indiscriminately targeted at innocent people going about a normal Saturday, doing their shopping,” said Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

    “Today Bondi Junction was the scene of horrific violence, but it was also witness to the humanity and the heroism of our fellow Australians, our brave police, our first responders, and of course our everyday people who could never have imagined that they would face such a moment,” he added.

    King Charles III said he and his wife Queen Camilla were “utterly shocked and horrified” by the “senseless attack” in Sydney and that their “hearts go out to the families and loved ones of those who have been so brutally killed.” The king’s eldest son Prince William and his wife Catherine, Princess of Wales, said they too were “shocked and saddened” and that their thoughts are with those affected and the “heroic emergency responders who risked their own lives to save others.”

    Pope Francis also expressed his sadness at the “senseless tragedy” in Sydney, offering his “spiritual closeness” to all those affected and prayers for the dead and injured.

    The message was contained in a telegram to Sydney Archbishop Anthony Fisher and sent by Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican’s secretary of state.


    The original article contains 875 words, the summary contains 241 words. Saved 72%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Man, this is why I get anxious in public places these days. Never know who will wreck/end your day/life.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Life is impermanent, it’s true. The good news is that once you die you don’t give a fuck so there’s a relatively small window where you’d regret your decision. It’s important to focus on the positive parts of life so you can enjoy it - that’s by no means easy - but it is important.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m not unhappy or not enjoying life, just anxious in public places with lots of people. Big crowds feel like targets these days rather than gatherings. 😶‍🌫️

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I get it but if it helps any, unless you live in a very select areas of the world actively having wars now, the odds of anything happening to you continue to fall as time goes on.

        There is nothing wrong with having feelings and there is nothing wrong with responding to the narrative you are presented with. I am simply pointing out the stats indicate you are not in danger. I hope you can utilize this fact and overcome your anxiety