I was just watching a tiktok with a black girl going over how race is a social construct. This felt wrong to me so I decided to back check her facts.

(she was right, BTW)

Now I’ve been using Microsoft’s Copilot which is baked into Bing right now. It’s fairly robust and sure it has it’s quirks but by and large it cuts out the middle man of having to find facts on your own and gives a breakdown of whatever your looking for followed by a list of sources it got it’s information from.

So I asked it a simple straightforward question:

“I need a breakdown on the theory behind human race classifications”

And it started to do so. quite well in fact. it started listing historical context behind the question and was just bringing up Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, who was a German physician, naturalist, physiologist, and anthropologist. He is considered to be a main founder of zoology and anthropology as comparative, scientific disciplines. He has been called the “founder of racial classifications.”

But right in the middle of the breakdown on him all the previous information disappeared and said, I’m sorry I can’t provide you with this information at this time.

I pointed out that it was doing so and quite well.

It said that no it did not provide any information on said subject and we should perhaps look at another subject.

Now nothing i did could have fallen under some sort of racist context. i was looking for historical scientific information. But Bing in it’s infinite wisdom felt the subject was too touchy and will not even broach the subject.

When other’s, be it corporations or people start to decide which information a person can and cannot access, is a damn slippery slope we better level out before AI starts to roll out en masse.

PS. Google had no trouble giving me the information when i requested it. i just had to look up his name on my own.

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    (she was right, BTW)

    I’d be curious to hear your conclusion on this while being well aware of the minefield I’m stepping onto.

      • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re not the person I’m asking nor does that reply by generative AI even begin to answer my question

          • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I can find wikipedia articles just fine by myself. I’m asking OP because I’m curious on hearing what made them change their mind on it. You’re not OP so I’m not interested on what you have to say on it.

        • nac82@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          You’re not interested in the topic, you mean. You just want somebody to pitch a softball so you can swing, but were scared of the speed on that fast ball.

          • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I’m asking OP because he said to have changed his mind on this so I’m curious to hear what argument did that.

            That “answer” given by AI that the other person linked is a statement, not an explanation. Your ad-hominem and poor attempt at mind reading is unproductive.