jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoGoogle mocks Epic’s proposed reforms to end Android app market monopolyarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1140arrow-down19cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1131arrow-down1external-linkGoogle mocks Epic’s proposed reforms to end Android app market monopolyarstechnica.comjeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square32fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zip
minus-squareozymandias117@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·7 months agoI really don’t know how to feel about it The people it’s intended to protect will just click “yes” to anything in my experience I don’t have a statistical analysis of results over a normal distribution of the world population, though
minus-squarehuginn@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoI feel like Epic wouldn’t be so strident about it without proof that it negatively affecting install rate. But maybe the perception that it affects the rate is sufficient.
minus-squareSMillerNL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoI think it affects install rate by design, which is bad for Epic in this case but good for security in most
I really don’t know how to feel about it
The people it’s intended to protect will just click “yes” to anything in my experience
I don’t have a statistical analysis of results over a normal distribution of the world population, though
I feel like Epic wouldn’t be so strident about it without proof that it negatively affecting install rate.
But maybe the perception that it affects the rate is sufficient.
I think it affects install rate by design, which is bad for Epic in this case but good for security in most