• The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Traffic jams would be a whole lot less damaging if they were all electric. Just sitting there with the AC and radio on is a whole lot less emissions compared to fossil fuels.

    • izzent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I prefer a rock solid public transport system, and plenty of safe walking areas and no-car zones. EVs help minimally in the grand scheme, since they are costly to produce, especially the batteries.

      • mack7400@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But then you lose your fReEdOm, and are beholden to another driver’s whims! Creep to the left or right side of the lane in your traffic jam? Forget it! All you can do is read, or play a game, or gaze forlornly at the liberated masterminds as you zip past in your socialist train!

      • Thurkeau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good luck with that, though. If this is America, and I think it is, we find ways of making a good public transit system suck. I also think we need to take a hard look at how our towns and cities are desined as well, and make them to where they’re optimized to be able to drive into a central location then bicycle or hoof it to whrever you wanted to go within a couple miles.

      • hydro033@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yea, that only works for cities. America will still need tons of cars for everywhere that isn’t a city. It’s a very low density country, all things considered.

        • Captain Minnette@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s large swathes of territory nearly as dense as parts of Europe with incredible public transit. Look at the density of Spain and overlay it on top of the northeast US, then compare the public transit.

          • hydro033@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yea, but the northeast, especially major cities like NYC, Boston, and Philly, does have better public transit than a lot of the US. I know it still sucks overall (and don’t get me going about the costs), but a lot of the infrastructure was built during the car boom. People do like cars, and they make sense for most of America given how much sprawl we have.

            • Captain Minnette@lemmy.fmhy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Local transit of those cities is pretty good, I’d agree. But the lack of intercity transit, like high speed rail, is such a shame.

      • The Pantser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which won’t happen especially in car first cities. I am in Michigan, it’s the home of the automobile and everything is built around it. To accommodate a good mass transit they would need to demolish large portions of the cities to install rail lines because busses are a lack luster bandage. Even with cities with great bus lines like Lansing or Ann Arbor it still can take hours for a trip across the city when a car gets you there and back in minutes. Business will also need to accommodate and give longer time off for doctors appointments. My wife rides the bus often in Lansing and if she has a appointment that is only a 10min car ride she is gone for 3 hours on the bus.

        • stylishboar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          To accommodate a good mass transit they would need to demolish large portions of the cities to install rail lines

          I don’t think this is true, at least not initially. There are cheaper alternatives, such as BRTs (dedicated bus lanes) and updating zoning to encourage destinations to develop closer. Sure, the US is obviously mostly car-centric today, but the cynical all-or-nothing mindset is hindering cities’ ability to even begin to make progress.

    • possiblylinux127@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The two issues I have with current EVs is you can’t work on them and they don’t last as long as gas vehicles.

      I have a old suburu and it still runs fine

      • Corhen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Its also worth remembering there is a lot less maintenance to do on an EV. No oil to change, lubes to replace, belts that break…

        Besides the batteries, an EV car should last longer than a gas car.

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Gas-powered cars can be and will be (if they aren’t already) subject to just as much DRM. Modern gas-powered cars have plenty of computers to apply DRM to. The only reason EVs may have more DRM currently is because they were developed from a tech company perspective which has more experience in software to implement that DRM. Running off a battery instead of gas doesn’t make a car inherently more DRM-able.

          • Corhen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            DRM… which makes you need to replace belts, and oil?

            I didn’t say they were easier to work on, just lower maintenance. On my gas car i need to change the oil ever 6 months. You dont need to do that with an EV.

        • Negromungusschlong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They have the same components except the engine, but they weigh more and the batteries dont last as long as a well maintained engine. EV cars should not last as long.

          • glibg10b
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            They have the same components except the engine

            • Transmission (usually larger and more expensive than the engine)
            • Exhaust, muffler and catalytic converter
            • Gas tank, fuel pump and vapor hose
            • Ignition coil(s), spark plugs, oil pump, intake and exhaust manifolds and fuel injectors
            • Fucking belts
            • CV joints, differentials and transfer case (I think)
            • A bunch of sensors
            • Throttle body
      • monobot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think this is just experience manufacturers gain and also we as customers get.

        People are already fixing batteries and teslas out of official stores.

        Also Tesla is really inexperienced manufacturer, they did stsrt off with bad build, but getting better.

    • seedbrage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s true, but electric cars won’t fix the core issue of car dependency and massive traffic jams