• flying_sheep
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    That was my immediate reaction here: one of the reasons the xz backdoor was possible is that nobody is going to question the idea of shipping a tarball to spare users from having to touch Autotools.

    Of course I wouldn’t think of manually hacking together Makefiles since I come from languages that have either the One True Build Tool or a standard for packaging and defining build backends.

    I think the author’s aversion to build tools trying (and apparently failing) to make everyone’s life easier is more a statement about how much C/C++ have suffered from not having a standard for packages.

    • onlinepersona@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      C/C++ have suffered from not having a standard for packages

      On top of the languages being a wonderful torture devices, their ecosystems are hell: SCons, Make, CMake, autotools, the configure scripts, lacking package management with no registry, no version locks, no good opensource IDEs, etc. . While the language has simply become a dumping ground for every paradigm known to programmers, the ecosystem is stuck in the 90s.

      Anti Commercial AI thingy

      CC BY-NC-SA 4.0