robocall@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 9 months agoDad has the chops to be a project manager.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up11.19Karrow-down17
arrow-up11.18Karrow-down1imageDad has the chops to be a project manager.lemmy.worldrobocall@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 9 months agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-squareKnasen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up123·9 months agoI got something similar in a requirement specification once: “Resolution supported: Max” “OS support: The latest one” 🤦🏼
minus-squareRonSijm@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up47·9 months ago"OS support: The latest one” is not that bad of an requirement… If they complain like “why doesn’t this work on Windows Vista, on IE8” - you can just point to the specs and say you only support the latest OS. So basically you only support the latest Nightly Build of Ubuntu, since that’s the current latest OS
minus-squarenxdefiant@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up15·edit-29 months agoYou don’t even need to support anything older than the last windows hot fix with requirements like that.
minus-squarelugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·9 months agoWhy support windows when you can argue that linux has a newer OS?
minus-squarenxdefiant@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up11·9 months agoI am humbled by your chess of many D’s.
minus-squareSocsa@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoThis is completely reasonable, but requires significant CI infrastructure
minus-squareMango@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoHonestly, I think that line of thought has a really cute reflection of the person’s experience with technology.
minus-squareAggressivelyPassive@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoI literally got the description “make it look cool” in my current project. We all know the context and can roughly guess what it means, but still…
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 months ago make it look cool Got it. Animated background, GIFs, HTML 4.01 frames, marquee, privacy-friendly ads which are just GIFs linking to other websites. Did I go too far with the last one?
minus-squareDeceptichum@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-29 months agoThat sounds fucking awesome.
I got something similar in a requirement specification once:
“Resolution supported: Max” “OS support: The latest one”
🤦🏼
"OS support: The latest one” is not that bad of an requirement…
If they complain like “why doesn’t this work on Windows Vista, on IE8” - you can just point to the specs and say you only support the latest OS.
So basically you only support the latest Nightly Build of Ubuntu, since that’s the current latest OS
You don’t even need to support anything older than the last windows hot fix with requirements like that.
Why support windows when you can argue that linux has a newer OS?
I am humbled by your chess of many D’s.
This is completely reasonable, but requires significant CI infrastructure
deleted by creator
Honestly, I think that line of thought has a really cute reflection of the person’s experience with technology.
I literally got the description “make it look cool” in my current project.
We all know the context and can roughly guess what it means, but still…
Got it. Animated background, GIFs, HTML 4.01 frames, marquee, privacy-friendly ads which are just GIFs linking to other websites. Did I go too far with the last one?
That sounds fucking awesome.