• Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    No this sexual assault story definitely proves it after all the other ones were debunked. We have no incentive to believe israel consistently lies about these stories to manufacture consent for Genocide.

    So convenient to bring it up 120 days after her release after the last batch of israeli rape accusations started to die down. Now they can start screaming for Hamas rape again while starving Gaza.

    If only israel didn’t weaponize false rape accusations to manufacture consent for Genocide fifty times this would be a lot easier to believe.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Not changing the story to gradually worsen every month sure helps credibilty.

        This woman did not say she was raped btw.

        • acargitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not saying the story consistently is precisely a sign that the trauma is actually real. Human brains actually work like that.

          • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Not a woman myself but I think there’s a difference between getting groped and what most people would think of with the term ‘raped’

            • Doof@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              You don’t compare in trauma therapy, it’s an unwise road to travel.

              • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                But you do in assessing proper reaction and punishment to the perpetrator. The wording used to the victim is a thin ice to thread and can be a lot different, completely for good reasons. The wording used to put the perpetrator on trial, especially if it appeals to the jury via public awareness, needs to be very specific, and any deviations from using exact words with right connotations is either used to lighten the crime or make it more vile than it perceptible is.