i think we need Cracked-style articles back. desperately. or like, a guy doing a weird thing and writing a piece on it. sites like those are declining faster than the glaciers.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    8 months ago

    A lot of informational content is now in video format instead of text/photos. I can barely understand their poor English in those videos.

    • Dave.@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I can read and skim documents for salient details at 500 - 800 words per minute.

      And then someone links me to a twelve minute video on YouTube where 800 words are spoken in total , 300 of those words are “um,so”, and all we’re looking at is either the narrator , or possibly a static slide with a few paragraphs on it… and also an inset of the narrator, narrating.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        You also can’t ctrl-f a video. It’s by far the worst format for information.

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          And in terms of actual information per kilobyte, it’s often absolutely laughable compared to text.

          Everyone’s using video for everything these days because that’s where the ad money is. Hooray, the tyranny of capitalism.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s very easy to process an actual article and evaluate whether it actually does what I’m looking for enough to read it properly.

      Video doesn’t provide that. It’s a bad format unless what you’re doing is actually visual in nature. Reviewing a video game? Sure, provided you’re spending meaningful examples of the actual mechanics. Reviewing a video camera? Absolutely.

      If your video is just you talking at a camera, it almost definitely shouldn’t be a video.

    • BitingChaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Googling so many “how do I do X?” type of questions have top-results of 10-minute videos where someone has their cluttered Desktop in full 1920x1080 and then they open the tiny command prompt in a small window (it’s clear they have no idea how to record a video), where they clumsily type commands they clearly don’t understand, and fumble through the entire process.

      I just needed a single command. It should have been a 1-second result at the top of search, not shitty videos or SEO dynamically-generated shit site that are trying to sell me something.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I never thought I’d be one to watch videos at 2x but there’s so much “content” out there that it helps to get through it plus lots of videos are padded anyway.