• HikingVet@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    9 months ago

    Jet fuel can make it soft enough to lose its ability to carry several hundred tons of load though.

  • Bronco1676
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Me reading the first word of each sentence instead of the first letter

    • MewtwoLikesMemes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      That is some Uncanny Valley bullshit right there.

       


      Edit: Welp, that was weird. Not sure what I thought was Uncanny Valley–esque about this image. Don’t see it now, but I did then. Fucking weird-ass brain…

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Was it an inside job? Probably not.

    Was it orchestrated intentionally to give us a reason to attack the middle east again? Probably.

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think the warning signs were intentionally ignored. And afterwards it was used as a reason to finish off Iraq.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          Absolutely! There’s never any smoking gun (that we’ll ever see anyway). But every indication is Netenfuck knew an attack was coming. He has been looking for any excuse to commit genocide and wipe Palestinians of the map.

      • Pantherina@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yeah but what part? Does a plane fly into some direction because it bursts?

        • InputZero
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          It says “Jet fuel doesn’t melt steel beams.” Which is true depending on the beam, but the steel beams in the WTC didn’t need to melt to fail. They just needed to be heated up to a point their yeild strength is lower than the weight of the building above it and physics takes over from there.

          • Pantherina@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            The steel beams that failed in the World Trade Center were primarily the floor trusses, which supported the floors between the columns. The intense heat from the burning jet fuel weakened these beams, causing them to lose their structural integrity and ultimately leading to the collapse of the towers.

            Thanks ChatGPT lol

            So the plane crashed into the building and there was a floor carried by steel beams and those bent and caused the whole building to collapse.

            • InputZero
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              Basically yeah. Once the floor buckled everything it supported did too, meaning a mind boggling amount of mass started moving and there’s no way to stop that much mass from falling at that point.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    So if this were true, I know, I know, but IF it were, he didn’t even get it when he typed it out. He may still have never gone back and done what she said. And also, how did she know that he would type exactly that?