The decision followed a New York Times report this month that G.M. had, for years, been sharing data about drivers’ mileage, braking, acceleration and speed with the insurance industry. The drivers were enrolled — some unknowingly, they said — in OnStar Smart Driver, a feature in G.M.’s internet-connected cars that collected data about how the car had been driven and promised feedback and digital badges for good driving.

If the article link contains a paywall, you can consider reading this alternative article instead: ‘GM Stops Sharing Driver Data With Brokers Amid Backlash’ on Ars Technica.

  • jkrtn
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Customers would probably like if manufacturers include a unit that uses the standardized protocol, yes.

    Are you not paying the manufacturer for the cellular service to run the climate control? That’s nice but doesn’t sound typical to me. I’d like to choose my own, or decline the cell service and have it only available from my wifi.

    • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Are you not paying the manufacturer for the cellular service to run the climate control?

      No, I’m not.

      I obviously would prefer open protocols and/or APIs for these things, but it should be possible without modding the car with additional hardware.