Politicians being told not to use a song happens surprisingly often actually, I know Donald Trump was told not to use one, I believe it was “rocking in the free world”. They’ve also told Nigel Farage off, apparently.

  • DosDude👾@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    “It’s a ridiculous misuse of the song because the song is about resilience and community, and the idea that we can fight back against the state and the forces that are keeping us down.”

    I thought I misheard the lyrics. But I just checked and it’s still about drinking… a lot. But sure, fuck the state by drinking I guess maybe.

    • liv@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Nah you’re actually both right there.

      They were a bunch of punk activists and also British, so the song is about their (alcoholic) neighbour and how working class people will keep a) tubthumping - trying to effect political change and b) trying to drunkenly unlock the front door.

  • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why would anyone need to ask for permission? These musicians sold off their rights long ago

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        This article only mentions them personally selling their music for individual advertising campaigns. It says nothing about the rights to play it at political rallies. As I can find it on Spotify and it plays on radio stations, it’s likely they outsourced at least part of the rights management.

        Also, I was reacting to the broader statement about musicians vs ‘political rally use’

        • liv@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Using a rights management agency isn’t the same as selling off/renouncing your rights to a property in perpetuity.

          Kind of like having a rental agent doesn’t mean you sold them the house.

          I’m sure every use request isn’t run past them personally but they’re political activists so there’s no way they would have a blanket “assume yes” policy on licensing for use by political entities.

    • thesmokingman@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      I can find no record that someone sold the rights to ISWC T-011.513.266-5 for the purpose of this use. Where are you getting your opinion?

      Note I’m not litigating the copyright system, just your comment.

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t know about those codes. Is that the one for Rocking in the Free World? It just seems very unlikely to me that Neil Young would personally oversee every single use of this song