Really loving the new experiences here on Lemmy.one. But I’m seeing many subs with off-topic posts. Community downvotes will help overworked mods find and remove such posts. I understand no one likes to be downvoted but it’s a necessary tool for our community and only helps users understand and refine what and where they are to be posting their content.

  • falcon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I recently had the experience where I was looking for a squid farm design in Minecraft. A Youtube video

    you would never know if the downvotes are because of video quality, someone not liking the narrator’s voice (or the content creator itself). As someone else mentioned, an actual comment saying it doesn’t work on a version is way clearer

    it’s also mostly (but not always) correlated with the quality and/or accuracy of the post

    it hasn’t been my experience in quite a few communities. People will downvote things they don’t wanna hear, even if it’s the truth, or just an opinion.

    • JuxtaposedJaguar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      You’re right that people may downvote for a variety of (possibly bad) reasons, which is why that metric shouldn’t be the only one you use. In addition to just being interesting and informative, I see overall negative sentiment as an indication that the content deserves more scrutiny. Not to discount it, but maybe verify claims that I would have otherwise taken at face value.

      Also, the process of manually reading and categorizing comments as positive or negative and then adding them up is much more labour intensive than just looking at a number. I can appreciate that there are some benefits to that approach, but I don’t think it’s worth it considering that there’s a native feature specifically for that purpose.

      • falcon@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I guess people in general prefer this way - which is probably why 99% of Lemmy instances have downvotes enabled. You can choose any one of them :)

        For me, it makes me more stressed about posting stuff, specially since you can be downvote bombed just for saying you didn’t like X book, or whatever.

        It also makes me more stressed when reading comments, for some reason. Either when I see an innocent random comment with negative points - I feel bad for the commenter - or when I end up using it as a disagree button and get more stressed. IDK why.

        So for me, not having it is way better. Otherwise I maybe wouldn’t even have created a Lemmy account, and used the “opportunity” (Reddit down in flames) to be less online - which I guess would also be a great outcome.

        TLDR: some people prefer no downvotes, but most instances allow them. Your user is already on lemmy.ml, so why do you care?

        • JuxtaposedJaguar
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I actually agree that people should just join an instance that best fits with their goals rather than trying to change an existing instance (assuming that things were always that way). I’m only arguing about the benefits of downvotes in general.

          I care because I think most people are better off with downvotes enabled; it would be in the best interest of the majority of people if they supported downvotes. I also support the existence of instances with downvotes disabled, I just don’t think that most people should use them.