• ComradeSharkfucker
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Thats inefficient, you dont need to cancel the angular momentum as there was no time limit on how long it takes rhe child to enter the sun and there also was not a specified required trajectory. The child can just spiral into the sun

    • Faust@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are no spiral orbits. Canceling the forward motion is exactly what you need to do, to bring down the next periapsis to 0. Now, you can go with a periapsis of about half a million km, because the sun is pretty big, but that is not a significant difference. Getting anywhere near the sun, is the hard part.

      • sushibowl@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s much more efficient in this case to do a bi-elliptic transfer: raise apoapsis very far out, then lower your periapsis once you are at apoapsis. Wikipedia says you could do it with about 8.8 km/s delta v. Versus 24 or so for a basic Hohman transfer (still a bit better than 30)

        Sadly the bi-elliptic transfer requires two burns so you can’t do it with a kick.

    • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      Right, I wanted to ask: is that actually the minimum energy to make the child reach the sun? What’s the minimum energy to launch something so it reaches the sun?

      • KISSmyOS@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        The minimum would be something like punting your kid to the orbit of Venus for a gravity assist that takes it to one of the outer planets where another gravity assist can push it to the edge of the solar system.
        Out there, the angular momentum of the orbiting child will be very low and can be canceled out by a small thrust.
        The child will then fall back into the sun. But this requires remote controlled thrusters strapped to the child. And a life support system if you want your child to actually die by burning in the sun. And then, the child will be well into their teens by the time they reach it.

    • Turun@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Right, and what force is acting on the child to make it deviate from a circular orbit into a spiral one?

    • Cutecity [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t think you can achieve a spiral orbit in an area with so little friction, mostly devoid of dust and gas, else the earth would be on one of those too…