“I think what you’re reacting to is that, at the moment, Biden is an unpopular president seeking a second term while Trump is a popular figure inside his party who is winning primary races. I wouldn’t necessarily compare the two.”

Credit to @JoshuaHolland

  • Melkath@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Post Citizens United/Hilary democrats are just as bad in that rite.

    The media sounds neutral on Trump because noone is surprised. The media is mostly silent on Biden because there is nothing to say other than ‘experts say he is slightly better than Trump’.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      to be fair you’re talking to a hillary democrat and id vote for her again if i could. she would have been a great president.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          While I think what she did was wrong, you can do the right thing and get the wrong outcome. You can also do the wrong thing and get a good outcome.

          My point is we should judge all politicians on the totality of their actions. Hilary would have been a good president, if flawed, just like any other good president. Trump was and would be a terrible president. He brings shame to the role and minimises the plight of those that suffer with his childish and petty nature.

          • bumphot@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            How can a politician that manipulates free elections and risking so much the lives of the many, for her own benefit, be a good president. She is obviously selfish and manipulative. She Got the worst possible candidate to be a Republican nominie just so she doesn’t have to let someone else more popular in her party be candidate.

            • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              If Hilary was president rather than Trump, millions of people would not have died of Covid. That’s good in my book. She may not be a good person, but she would have been a good and effective president.

              Manipulation implies what she did was nefarious. Like her opposition, that actively manipulated, conspired with the enemy, against the law, and then started a coup.

              • Revan343@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                If that’s your bar for what qualifies as a ‘good president’, then your opinion is worthless

                • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  If when your only contribution to the discussion is insults, it’s clear you cannot even express your opinion. That’s such a shame, I’m sure it would be insightful.

              • bumphot@lemy.lol
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Hilary, just like Trump, is a rich person shill and would do anything to get corporations that are losing money from lockdown to get what they want. She is no better, she got Trump as a primary Republican candidate in her pied piper strategy just because she knew she would certainly lose if someone more reasonable would have been a Republican candidate.

                • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Hilary, just like Trump, is a rich person shill

                  Absolutely

                  and would do anything to get corporations that are losing money from lockdown to get what they want

                  Absolutely

                  She is no better

                  Hundreds of thousands of people who died of Covid, who wouldn’t have if Trump hadn’t fucked up the response, would disagree

                  Dozens of dead CIA agents, God knows how many dead Kurds, would disagree

                  The capitol policemen who got beat and maimed and disabled for doing their jobs would disagree

                  Little Honduran kids who got separated from their parents at the border, or their families who still haven’t gotten them back and may never see them again, would disagree

                  There is a yawning chasm between saying that Hillary is pretty crappy as candidates go, especially if you want real change in the US, and saying she’s no better than Trump.

                  • bumphot@lemy.lol
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    All of the things and much worse then that happens under both Democrats and Republicans and Hilary is no better. After all, if she knew Trump was that bad, why would she risk all of that and support him in her pied piper strategy if she actually cares about any of these people? The examples you listed are the smallest arguments you could make, since any of that is easily overshadowed by an actual genocide both sides fund. Since when should people have empathy towards CIA agents that coup governments, traffic drugs, kill people and destroy democracies for benefit of some oil companies. And since when should we have empathy for murder cops? And how would you be sure that less people would have died of Covid with Hilary, she has same interests as Trump did in that situation. And Democrats where happy with not letting separated kids be reunited, they just pretend like they always do.

                    And all of these are so small compared to most important issues like wealth inequilty, gencoide, housing crisis, etc. Where their rich people policies are almost identical. Don’t be fooled by their propaganda.

      • Melkath@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yup, great for lobbyists, wall street, and the military industrial complex.

        Like Biden.

        Progressives have killed the democrat party.

        • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 months ago

          You are left-wing, correct? Good leftist who’s just upset with Biden for not being left enough?

          I ask because I have literally never heard a left wing person say “Democrat party”.

          • Melkath@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Well, in the better times, Democrats called themselves liberals.

            They stopped genocides, they didn’t enable them.

            Hilary refused to call herself a liberal (because she is a conservative) and lost to Obama bringing the word “Progressive” back to to the party and killing the term “Liberal”.

            I was a liberal democrat. Now I am a disenfranchised fuck you all, don’t commit genocide, don’t subsidize billionaires, shelter and feed the homeless, make housing affordable again guy.

            • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Ah yes, all those OG Democrats with their humane and sensible Israel policy. As an old-school left wing person like you, I remember them well. Which ones were your favorites?

              • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Y’all remember Kennedy and how he called for the end of the Vietnam War? Yeah, me neither.

                Both parties have always had pretty shitty international policy, but at least one of those parties actually wants to govern and participate in democracy.

        • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          but when you look at actions in his control (outside of congress), biden has been one of the most progressive, pro union democrats in recent history

          • Melkath@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            Passing legislation that prevents railway workers from protesting and in turn working out a private deal where they get a one time raise that isnt codified in law is pro union?

            Yes, that is progressivism. Its being crony conservative, but Democrat.

            Damn… I am just taken aback by your take. Eat up their lies, keep your eyes as tightly shut as possible.

              • Melkath@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                … but no form of annual or cost of living wage increases went through congress.

                Give a starving man a fish and he will call you a god. Ban him from ever fishing again and wait 3 days… reap what you sow.

          • Cowbee [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Being pro-worker for a tepid neoliberal is like being woke for a member of the GOP. While better than outright fascism, of course, liberalism is inherently anti-worker and pro-Capitalist. Biden has been giving band-aids to gaping stab wounds and running victory laps, without attempting to meaningfully address the root cause.