Exclusive: most renters surveyed by Harris Poll say the areas they live in have become so unaffordable they are ‘barely livable’

The poll, conducted by the Harris Poll Thought Leadership and Future Practice, asked survey takers to identify themselves as renters or homeowners, along with other demographic information. Those polled were asked their opinion on home ownership in the United States. For many, especially renters, the outlook is bleak.

Though the vast majority of renters polled said they want to own a home in the future, 61% said they are worried they will never be able to. A similar percentage believe no matter how hard they work, they’ll never be able to afford a home.

“When you think about Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, and housing is right at that foundational level of security, the implications on consumer psyche when things feel so unaffordable is something that will impact everyone,” said Libby Rodney, chief strategy officer at Harris Poll. The American dream of owning a home “is looking more like a daydream for renters”.

  • altasshet@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Renting by itself would be fine, it’s just that there’s barely any rent control in North America, and you’re constantly at the mercy of your landlord, inflation and general greed. Put national standards for renter protection and rent increases in place and this would be much less of a problem.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      Renting should never be the goal and always leaves you at a disadvantage and subject to market forces.

      For decades renters were “pulling one over” on landlords and told there was no reason to ever own a home. Now it’s come back to bite them in the ass.

      Rent wouldn’t even be an issue if everyone had been fighting for unions and min wage increases all along.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        This would still have happened with stronger wages, it just would have taken longer to get so bad. There was never sufficient supply and that was on purpose.

      • altasshet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Wouldn’t it make sense to minimize that disadvantage then? There will always be people who have no other choice but rent, so they should be protected from exploitation. And stronger renter protection could cool down the housing market, because it makes being a landlord work multiple properties less attractive. Win-win if you ask me.