• arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’ve seen enough body cam incidents to know the papers can say one thing and events revealed later by the footage depict another. General police guidance of use of lethal force is when there is an imminent danger to safety so it boils down to whether the kid charged a cop or a member of his family or not.

      • arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’ve seen plenty of clips where the cops are in the wrong. Idiot cops firing pistols by accident or shooting in the absence of imminent threat. And that’s why I support body worn cameras and full disclosure. Is is also why I am extremely skeptical of newspapers jumping to conclusions in the absence of the footage. It is very easy for relatives of the deceased to decry the cops as racist, or trigger happy and it be reported as such. And then the footage comes out and it shows something completely different.

      • arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s exactly right, release the footage and stop jumping to conclusions.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          But the poster you are responding to did jump to a conclusion. I hope you’re pointing that out.

    • arc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      A lot of people voting me down very clearly know the truth because the newspaper told them so. Despite lacking the footage to make that judgement.