A Massachusetts town that adopted an unusual ordinance banning the sale of tobacco to anyone born in the 21st century is being looked at as a possible model for other cities and towns hoping to further clamp down on cigarettes and other tobacco products.
  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    11·
    9 months ago

    Would you stop being this childish?

    My guy, I’m laying out historical facts and your response only ever seems to be name calling.

    Unless you plan to argue that people were eating paint to get high

    There’s quite literally a name for it - Pica. And lead paint, which is sweet because it contains lead, is a common substance people with pica would consume.

    You apparently don’t actually know what it means to “huff paint”.

    The incentives to include lead in paint, to enhance the color, and in gasoline, to prevent engine knocking, have existed for decades. Exposure can be recreational, but it can also simply be by way of chronic exposure. Nevertheless, there are economic incentives for including lead in the product in both cases. And the prohibition overrode that incentive.

    Because the US isn’t the only country in the world, and prohibition of psychoactive substances (since you’re anally, pedantically, and utterly childishly still pretending not to understand what the context of this conversation is) has never worked

    It has successfully deterred the sale and consumption of a variety of psychoactive substances, ranging from LCD to oxytocin, by eliminating them from drug retailers’ shelves.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      1·
      9 months ago

      You’re not laying out any sort of facts. You’re trying to purposefully distract from the actual topic, because you know you don’t know shit about it.

      There’s quite literally a name for it - Pica.

      Pica has nothing to do with getting high. It’s a craving for weird things.

      We’re talking about the prohibition of recreational substances. Is lead a recreational substance? Is asbestos a recreational substance? “My guy”, you are being extremely childish. It’s downright funny.

      It has successfully deterred the sale and consumption of a variety of psychoactive substances, ranging from LCD to oxytocin, by eliminating them from drug retailers’ shelves.

      No, it hasn’t. It’s increased them. And do you know how I know you’re an ignorant person talking out of their arse on the subject?

      You write “LCD”, like screens, when you mean “LSD”, like the drug. You also write “oxytocin”, the neurotransmitter (colloquially known as the “bonding hormone”) when you mean “oxycodone”, what Oxycontin is made of.

      Which prohibition of a recreational substance has worked? Name one RECREATIONAL SUBSTANCE that has been successfully banned. (Note, even if you recreate by shoving pencils up your nose, that does not make pencils a recreational substance in this context.) You name one, and I’ll show you where you can buy it, because no such thing exists as no prohibition [of a recreational substance] works.