• echo64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t think “unconstitutional” is the word you want here. There’s endless things you are not free to purchase or choose for yourself.

    • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      “Unconstitutional” == I don’t like it

      Literally as deep as most people’s understanding goes.

    • hornface@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not going to argue about whether or not it’s constitutional (because I don’t know), but I just wanted to point out that this case is slightly more complicated than just “you’re not allowed to purchase”. It’s “you’re not allowed to purchase… BUT other people are”. Which means it’s potentially a question of discrimination, which is maybe not as cut-and-dry as a “normal” law banning a substance across the board.