• pixelscience@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Like they’re going to just take the lack of those fee profits off the bottom line. Look forward to the new and/or increased yearly fees now.

      • pixelscience@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        It wasn’t a suggestion at all.

        I was just saying that we, the consumer are going to end up paying for it somehow or another.

        • 4lan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          then why have any consumer protections? and why have a minimum wage?

          They are just going to make up for it with higher prices right? Let’s make min wage $1 so we can all enjoy low prices. right?

          You are playing into their hands

    • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Even if that was the end result, still better than now as it would be a planned expense rather than an additional weight on people in financial trouble

    • AngryMob@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Assuming the total remains similar, its good to move the burden away from people who are struggling.

    • BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Have to start somewhere. This might move the fees upfront and keep people from getting trapped when the person doesn’t read all the fine print.