At the moment these artificial “embroys” aren’t really human beings though, any more than a kidney is a whole ass person. These clumps of cells don’t grow lungs, a brain, or any of the other structures required to form a full person and they are extremely unlikely to form viable pregnancies if implanted into a womb.
The ethical questions are likely to be more related to how long scientists should be allowed to grow these artificial embryos for in a lab and more generally whether the laws for scientific growth of real human embryos should apply to artificial ones or if the potential benefits outweigh the ickyness.
Any debate about actually growing full humans using this tech is probably decades away from being really relevant and could potentially harm research into pregnancy using this tech - research that could easily save a lot of lives.
I have to strongly agree with you there. We already have the technology available to perform what this article labels as potentially troublesome. It seems to me that this is a far better innovation than current live-subject testing. Hell, we already have human cell testing, this just allows for organ level testing instead of just at the cellular level.
At the moment these artificial “embroys” aren’t really human beings though, any more than a kidney is a whole ass person. These clumps of cells don’t grow lungs, a brain, or any of the other structures required to form a full person and they are extremely unlikely to form viable pregnancies if implanted into a womb.
The ethical questions are likely to be more related to how long scientists should be allowed to grow these artificial embryos for in a lab and more generally whether the laws for scientific growth of real human embryos should apply to artificial ones or if the potential benefits outweigh the ickyness.
Any debate about actually growing full humans using this tech is probably decades away from being really relevant and could potentially harm research into pregnancy using this tech - research that could easily save a lot of lives.
China has an aging population that will not wait to continue this technology
What use do you see China having for this that they couldn’t already do with conventional cloning that’s been around for like 30 years now?
I have to strongly agree with you there. We already have the technology available to perform what this article labels as potentially troublesome. It seems to me that this is a far better innovation than current live-subject testing. Hell, we already have human cell testing, this just allows for organ level testing instead of just at the cellular level.