• thejml@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Anytime you get to that length, you always have to think about whether or not someone will have a drive to read it, a computer that it works on, and matching programs to decode the data. Think about some of the formats we had in the 70’s and 80’s and how often people actually have that hardware and software in working order now.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      Think about some of the formats we had in the 70’s and 80’s and how often people actually have that hardware and software in working order now.

      Well yea, but it’s a matter of funding and business/government desire. 99% of the time the only people who care about accessing things that old are hobbyists and enthusiasts.

      If something critical to a fortune 500 company or government was stored on it and they needed it they would have the means to contract out a specialty one off device just to read it (Or contract out to a very pricey data recovery shop)

      And software is software, we can still run 70s and 80s software through a myriad of virtualization technologies fairly easily and cheaply.

      • umbrella
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        old family videos? old government data?

        its not just for hobby.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        You want to make some money? Start manufacturing microfiche readers. There was a brief time in the 20th century where microfilm and microfiche was all the rage for archiving and even publishing technical documents, and now there’s a lot of data people need for various reasons and no device to retrieve it on because they all got put in a room in the back of a library and got kicked in when someone backed into the room carrying a heavy box.

      • Godort@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Assuming the software isn’t lost, then yeah, typically it can be emulated or reverse engineered to work.

        The bigger hurdle is the hardware, especially if the encoding of the data was proprietary, meaning that even if you could get a reading without it, you’d still need to figure out how to decode it into useful data

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          That’s the only hurdle if you have the software and decoding both of which are emulateable. Which wouldn’t be overly hard to reverse engineer a connector if you have everything else…