Netflix’s live-action Avatar has its heart in the right place, but its pacing and uneven performances leave a lot to be desired.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Please let’s all remember that these are child actors, and they are no responsible for the poor writing or direction in the show. We can be sure they have worked extremely hard and poured their lives into this show, and the ones we should be disappointed with are the showrunners.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      9 months ago

      If the acting is bad, we can be mad at the casting director as well. It doesn’t really matter if they’re child actors, that doesn’t make them immune from being called bad actors. They don’t deserve to get dunked on or solely blamed for the show, but let’s not pretend they don’t play a part in its quality. If they were amazing actors, I’d assume you’d have no issue giving them praise? Why is the opposite not true?

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The problem is people tend to go way the hell overboard when it comes to criticism and some child actors can’t handle it. Look at what happened with Jake Lloyd as an example. Best to just leave the children out of the criticism and make it about the adults who made the decisions.

        • CerealKiller01@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          People tent to go way the hell overboard on a lot of things. Best to focus on constructive criticism, while keeping in mind the actors are children, rather than to blindly self-censor based on the subject.

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Strawman argument.

          If a kid plays the piano in a shitty way, it’s okay to say “well, he sucks.”

          Edit: Fuck, man. I didn’t say to say it to his face! Let’s just say that it’s okay to think “well, he sucks.” You CANNOT tell me you don’t think this way if the kid says “I’ve been practicing for months” and you see him just smashing the keyboard. Stop being emotional. If the kid asks for my opinion, I’d probably say “good job! Good effort, keep practicing!” But for sure, I’ll be thinking “welp, he sucks.”

          • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            actually no. That’s called being an asshole. You can say that he has room to improve, or that he’s still learning, or literally anything but “wow they just suck” like some asshole.

          • Lmaydev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            No strawman. One is positive and one is negative. That’s why they are different lol

            And no it’s not really okay. You should encourage children.

            • El Barto@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Maybe I misread the original comment. Where is the false equivalency? I don’t see OP saying “good and bad are the same.”

              I of course encourage children. I’m not a psycho. I’m referring to the fact that you can tell when a kid is brilliant, and when a kid simply sucks. But yeah, if you tell the kid “kid, stop, you suck,” then that’s a WTF moment.

            • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Being uncomfortable with criticism does not mean immunity from criticism. This isn’t a middle school play FFS, it’s a licensed series for something that already has a large, established fan base. Millions of dollars went into this. People’s careers depended on this. Using “they’re just kids!” to deflect legitimate criticism toward their acting abilities is not only nonsensical, it’s cowardly.

    • blargerer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve only watched the first 2 episodes, and yeah some of the performances come off quite bad, but I think the editing is at least partially to blame. They hold on characters too long and at odd moments completely destroying any sense of natural tempo in conversations.

      • Microw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        yeah there was at least one scene where I was like “what the hell, the actors are awkwardly looking at something that isn’t there, you clearly could have cut away from that take!”

        Btw we have some discussions for the first few episodes on !avatar@lemmy.world if you want to weigh in there

      • nachtigall@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I think it was fine overall. But this is one of the few shows where I actually prefer the dub of my native language because the voice acting was rather underwhelming. To be fair the German voice cast is the same as the original show so they have more than 20 years of experience and nostalgia might play a role too 😁

  • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Even with each of its eight episodes clocking in at about an hour each, it would have been difficult for Netflix’s Avatar to hit all of the same beats as the lengthier cartoon.

    Ah well theres your problem. I was actually rooting for this to be good but surprise surprise, Netflix is still shit.

    • Yukito01@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean, to be fair, 8 episodes at 1 hour each is more or less the same runtime that 20 episodes of ~20 min each. The problem is not the amount of episodes, it’s just bad direction.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 months ago

        Same runtime maybe, but not the same pace. Would you have them just switch from one story to another a third of the way through the episode?

        • Infynis@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Lots of animated shows do that, though they only usually have two stories due to shorter runtimes

          • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s more because they have an allotted time slot on their TV network. Like Nickelodeon gave Spongebob 22 minutes per episode but they only wanted to write 10 minute episodes, so they did 2 per episode. That’s not really relevant on a streaming service where they have total control over the episode pacing. They can even do weird stuff like having different episodes in a series run for different durations.

      • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Better direction would probably help but fitting multiple episodes from the original into a few here seems like its asking for issues. But as you said, bad direction is more the issue. Im sure someone will make a better ATLA live action at some point.

  • fubarx
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Just finished watching Episode 1. Don’t care what the reviews say. It’s a great show. Decent acting and pretty good SFX. Looking forward to Ep. 2.

  • Jakdracula@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Watching the latest trailer it’s very easy to see the poor acting. It’s pretty bad when you catch a 3 second glimpse of a scene and can see in those few seconds just how poorly the acting and dialogue is, ooof.

  • TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Me and my family like it. They grew up with the original and didn’t know a live action was in the works until I started it up yesterday.

    We also liked Netflix’s Cowboy Bebop but all the neckbeards managed to cancel it fast.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah I liked bebop, and one piece, and this too. The only note I would have on this is regarding iroh. It seems like the actor is playing him 100% sober, so we lose a bit of the iroh charm I think.

      • telllos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I really really like Paul Sun-Hyung Lee. He was amazing in Kims convenience. In my opinion he does a pretty good Iroh. Overall the cast is very good Zuko, Sokka are pretty spot on. I’m not a die hard fan of avatar. But I liked the cartoon and enjoy the show. I don’t get the hate. I mean after watching uncharted…

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Oh yeah, he was great as Iroh, that was only the littlest of gripes. And maybe 2 days after I posted that I read that the director told him to not match the voice

  • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Sadly bad live action will devalue rare good live action shows like One Piece, because people will skip it as being another bad show, while it isn’t.

    • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      Maybe it’s an unpopular opinion, but I thought the new One Piece hit all the emotional beats of the anime even if it didn’t get all the details the same. I wasn’t disappointed, although I was prepared to be.

      Is Avatar even really anime though? That’s kinda like calling Taco Bell Mexican food.

      • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Is Avatar even really anime though?

        What, why not? We are talking about master of elements Avatar, not Pandora Avatar, right?

      • TheOgreChef@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Is that unpopular? I thought One Piece got near-universally praised, but I didn’t pay attention to the discourse beyond the first week or so it was out so I missed the pivot if there was one.

        Like you, I braced for the worst and actually liked it quite a bit. I think the changes they made were fairly well done.

        I would say Avatar is a solid American homage to anime, but the average tv viewer would see the art style and assume that it’s anime so most outlets are just framing it that way.

  • Taigagaai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why did they make it so dark and gritty? That’s my main complaint having seen the first episode.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Did they? I think they made the scenes with the actual, you know, war, more dark and gritty. But there are plenty light hearted scenes with Aang just being a kid?

      Btw we have some discussions for the first few episodes on !avatar@lemmy.world if you want to weigh in there

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Compare this graph to the most well received movies and shows. Let’s say, The Godfather. This allegedly got way, way better reviews than The Godfather.

  • Shalakushka@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    66
    ·
    9 months ago

    Wait until you go back to watch the original cartoon and find it’s just a competent kids show for two seasons and one season of rushed nothing.

    Maybe the reason these adaptations keep not working is because the source material isn’t actually the magnum opus the people who watched it when they were 10 years old think it is.

    Maybe it’s just cursed, but the conversation around this show feels a lot like Star Wars that way.

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      9 months ago

      I was 25 when the show premiered and watched it a few years later based on recommendations from a colleague. Me and my wife loved it, it’s definitely not just a show that only works for 10 year olds.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        And neither is the live action netflix one at this moment. Nostalgia colors everything, showing it in a bad light. People saw the colorful cartoon, and can’t bear the fact that lighting is darker in live action for example.

    • EarthlingHazard@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s funny you think that. I did watch the animated show when I was much younger and gave it a rewatch recently. I’m in my early 30s and as far as animated TV shows go it’s still one of my favorites

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve rewatched it multiple times over the years, i still think it holds up very well. I will give you the last season feeling a bit rushed, but that usually comes down to funding concerns rather than intentional choice (excluding GoT).