Just curious.

  • cerevant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    There’s a great reason for him not to: he can create a paid Lemmy client based on the code. Dude made way too much money on that piece of software to just give it away.

    • FlaxPicker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      I love Mlem so far but if Apollo came back converted to Lemmy, i would at least try out both.

    • Teflo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Definitely. I think once he picks himself up after the initial shock of it all, he’d probably give it a go if demand calls for it. He was very passionate about Apollo, I don’t think it’s going to die here and now, nor do I think he wants it to die.

      Tapbots went through the same thing with Tweetbot -> Ivory. It’s just really hard to give up labour of love projects, especially ones that you’ve invested the last decade into.

      • cerevant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        It seems like a no-brainer to me. He’s already don the hard UI work, adapting to a new API is pretty trivial by comparison.

        • Alec
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Eh, it depends. Sometimes a lot of the API is integrated with the components and adapting a new API means tearing apart the entire codebase.

          For example, Lemmy-UI has an open PR to replace the websockets API with the HTTP one and it’s a huge change. And that’s just switching a type of API for the same backend – not switching the entire backend!