• smegforbrains
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not a single argument from you to support your views or to deconstruct mine.

        • smegforbrains
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes I will as long as you are not engaging in a civil discussion, but keep succumbing to logical fallacies. You could try using viable arguments though.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’ve stated my arguments for you repeatedly, and they haven’t changed. It’s pretty clear that I’m not going to convince you of anything nor will you convince me. Therefore, any meaningful discussion ended once the arguments were stated, and I see no point regurgitating the same points over and over. Are you so insecure in your views that you need external validation from strangers, and just can’t accept that your points aren’t convincing to others?

                • smegforbrains
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  My point is that we should not produce more nuclear waste as long as we do not have adequate storage facilities for the long term.