• Tak
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • smegforbrains
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t think that’s right. The page clearly states “Nuclear reprocessing is the chemical separation of fission products and actinides from spent nuclear fuel.”

      • alcoholicorn [comrade/them, doe/deer]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        There’s both, there was a plant in Savanah Ga that was supposed to process nuclear weapons into fuel, but after they got the weapons, they stalled on building the plant.

        There were other plans to build reprocessing facilities for old fuel in the US (or breeder reactors that can use them as is) that all died off after the fall of the USSR opened up kazakstan, tanking the price of Uranium.

        • Tak
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          deleted by creator

      • Tak
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • smegforbrains
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          But yes please try to convince me and the readers. That’s how discussion work.

          “3% of the mass consists of fission products of 235U and 239Pu (also indirect products in the decay chain); these are considered radioactive waste or may be separated further for various industrial and medical uses.”

          Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spent_nuclear_fuel