☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to Share Funny Videos, Images, Memes, Quotes and more English · 1 year agoGermans be likeimagemessage-square546fedilinkarrow-up1470arrow-down167
arrow-up1403arrow-down1imageGermans be like☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to Share Funny Videos, Images, Memes, Quotes and more English · 1 year agomessage-square546fedilink
minus-squareThe Octonaut@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up35arrow-down4·1 year agoYou can put nuclear waste in a box and decide what to do with it later. CO² is less helpful that way.
minus-squareHestia [she/her, love/loves]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down2·1 year agoAnd unlike my bills, it becomes less dangerous the longer you ignore them.
minus-squaredangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·edit-21 year agoWe already have carbon storing technology. Also, you wanted subscript for the 2.
minus-squareThe Octonaut@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·1 year agoI didn’t say we didn’t have carbon storing technology, but if you aren’t aware that it’s more difficult to recapture carbon than to put spent fuel in a box, you probably should read past the first paragraph of whatever Wikipedia article you found.
minus-squarethreelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoNo no no, they definitely meant “carbon monoxide squared”.
You can put nuclear waste in a box and decide what to do with it later. CO² is less helpful that way.
And unlike my bills, it becomes less dangerous the longer you ignore them.
We already have carbon storing technology. Also, you wanted subscript for the 2.
I didn’t say we didn’t have carbon storing technology, but if you aren’t aware that it’s more difficult to recapture carbon than to put spent fuel in a box, you probably should read past the first paragraph of whatever Wikipedia article you found.
No no no, they definitely meant “carbon monoxide squared”.