Interesting considering the number of people who took the last ruling as proof of a genocide. I’d have expected the Court to intervene if they felt that way.

    • S_204@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’d agree, I’m just interested in how those claiming that the last ruling was a clear indictment are reconciling this latest ruling. I fully expected the Court to tell Israel to gtfo of Rafah but it seems like they’re looking at this like it’s a conventional Urban war based on this ruling.

      • dbilitated@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        given the amount of influence Israel has though I’m not sure how strong they’d make their statements, the US still supports them

        • S_204@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I mean… we’ve seen the bias show thru at the UN without US interference before. Israel has more human rights censures than any other middle east country for example LoL. The panel is CLEARLY able to pass judgement, the US steps in before the resolutions are passed though at the lower levels.