Less meat is nearly always better for the environment than "sustainable" meat | Despite differences in farming practices across the world, plant-based protein sources still have a lower footprint

usernamesAreTricky · 2 years ago

Less meat is nearly always better for the environment than "sustainable" meat | Despite differences in farming practices across the world, plant-based protein sources still have a lower footprint

TendieMaster69@sh.itjust.works · edit-2 1 year ago

deleted by creator

CraigeryTheKid@beehaw.org · 2 years ago

I said similar wherever this was what posted earlier, but yeah, even if you replace beef with poultry there’s a considerable difference.

These types of stories partially led to us switching seat from beef. I’ll still get it at restaurants, but almost never buy beef (or pork) for groceries. Small steps!

Linnce · edit-2 2 years ago

Amazon lost about 44 million hectares to agriculture in 35 years, 86.3% of which became pasture and 13.6% were used for agriculture.

Source in portuguese

That’s about the size of California for the americans.

SlimyRat · edit-2 2 years ago

Dude I see you everywhere. I did hear about a company setting up a lab grown meat factory recently though. Hopefully this’ll help the problem.

The World’s Top Beef Supplier Is Building a Lab-Grown Meat Plant

Jediotty@beehaw.org · 2 years ago

Vegan as of last week, don’t plan on going back.

Less meat is nearly always better for the environment than "sustainable" meat | Despite differences in farming practices across the world, plant-based protein sources still have a lower footprint

Less meat is nearly always better for the environment than "sustainable" meat | Despite differences in farming practices across the world, plant-based protein sources still have a lower footprint

Less meat is nearly always better than sustainable meat, to reduce your carbon footprint