• Coreidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    No thanks. We don’t need more celebs as president.

    It takes a lot more then just being a personality on TV to be a good president.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Being a celebrity shouldn’t be disqualifying. Trump was a dumb, loud criminal before being president and stayed a dumb, loud crimnal as president.

      Stewart is in one of the most intelligent, articulate, charismatic and compassionate people in the public sphere and one can only hope he would be such as president. If he wanted to run, which he doesn’t.

      • Coreidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        intelligent, articulate, charismatic and compassionate people in the public sphere

        Great but it takes a lot more than that to be a GOOD president.

        You need to be more than just popular. I know it’s a common mistake to think celebrities will make good presidents because they have charisma.

        That is how we ended up with Trump.

        Have higher standards.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          The most important qualification a leader can have is the trust of the population.

          Everything else is what advisors are for, and despite what you want to believe Stewart has seen how the kosher sausage is made, when he bullied Congress into taking care of the 9/11 first responders.

          There are many, many worse candidates out there, and quite frankly not many better.

          Is that a sad state of affairs?

          Sure. But it’s also reality.

          And, just fyi, Trump wasn’t a bad candidate because he was a TV celebrity.

          He was a bad candidate because he’s an idiotic fascist.

          • Coreidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            The most important qualification a leader can have is the trust of the population.

            Nope. Not at all. Again this is how we get people like Trump as president.

            He was a bad candidate because he’s an idiotic fascist.

            And yet half the population trusts the moron so we’re gonna agree to disagree.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s why I didn’t even mention “popular”, and listed a bunch of other traits besides charisma.

          Comparing Stewart with Trump is lazy and simplistic, do better.

    • niktemadur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s almost like a medieval peasant mentality, still regarding the presidency as some sort of faux-monarchy, with a certain aura, missing the point that an executive branch is not just a president who can work the cameras and microphones, that is just the tip of the iceberg, as there are a myriad employees chosen by the president and his top appointees.

      There’s an old chinese curse - “May your children live in interesting times”, and there is a saying that the best leaders are practically invisible, as the whole group works towards a common goal.
      We seem to always be living through interesting times, gravitating towards interesting characters, when what we really should want are boring government nerds who operate on reason and science, with no need nor inclination to make a loud splash.