• Tire
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    Got some pot on you? Straight to jail. Try to overthrow the government? See you in 3+ years where you MIGHT get a slap on the wrist but also might get to be president again.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      While you’re almost certainly right… this is your response to what should be a tiny bit of good news? Maybe it’s time for a break from the news?

      I mean, what would you have done if they had ruled in favor of immunity instead of denying it??

      As for me, I’ll take the w here.

      • criitz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I kinda get your point, but also If you watch enough news you realize there is no W here. It’s all meaningless because Trump owns SCOTUS and they have the final say.

        EDIT: No, SCOTUS isn’t beholden to Trump but electing him is in their interests.

        EDIT2: Well I certainly hope yall are right and they won’t let him on the ballot but I’m not holding my breath.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          They’ve ruled against him a lot. They could have thrown a huge wrench into the election by allowing Texas to sue PA, buy they didn’t it. If he owned it, it would go the other way.

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          lol be more wrong, my man

          SCOTUS is laden with Federalist Society conservative wackjobs, but they (aside from Thomas and Alito a bit) have zero love for Trump. They’re more than happy to side with him when it serves long-term conservative principles and aims, but that have demonstrated zero hesitation when his policies and pleadings don’t align with their own.

          • criitz@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            But him winning the presidency does align with their goals. So yeah, saying he owns them is wrong, but it’s how they’re gonna vote.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Except the Trump presidency does coincide with their aims. Trump would Usher in the greatest destruction of the federal government in US history. He’s the federalist society’s dream. He has no morals or Scruples he does whatever his advisors tell him and his advisors are from the Federalist Society.

            • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              They’re killing Chevron without him. Maybe read something instead of harvesting takes from YouTube and Twitter, my dude.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Damn paywalls…

    Short article though:

    Donald Trump can be prosecuted for trying to overturn the 2020 US election, a federal appeals court ruled, rejecting his claim of immunity and moving him closer to trial before November’s presidential vote as he seeks to return to the White House. The decision by a three-judge panel with the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit marks a watershed moment in the historic prosecution of Trump by Special Counsel Jack Smith on criminal charges of conspiring to reverse his loss in the last election and remain in power. Trump, the frontrunner for the Republican nomination, may be the first major party candidate to stand trial for criminal actions while campaigning for the presidency.

  • SatanicNotMessianic
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s a foregone conclusion that Trump is going to win the Republican nomination. The nightmare scenario for the republicans has to be Trump going in as the nominee and then being found guilty of a felony charge. It won’t bleed off the Trumpists, but it certainly might make the never-Bidens stay home rather than voting for the guy.

  • Jo Miran
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Trump has until Feb. 12 to appeal ruling to Supreme Court

    Where his hand picked pack of fascist court majority will reverse the appeals court decision.

    • Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Will they though? It’s a dangerous precedent to set and would let Biden make use of the same immunity (not that he’s likely to use the opportunity…)

  • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 months ago

    Chutkan had to reschedule the trial, so they got the delay they were looking for and can now make the obvious judgement that could have been made weeks ago.

    Jack Smith is so fucked, I feel bad for the poor guy. He’s like Grimes trying to protect us from Homer.