He signed an executive order on Thursday, saying violence had reached “intolerable levels”.

The sanctions will block the individuals from accessing all US property and other assets.

Violence in the West Bank has spiked since Hamas’s 7 October attack on Israel.

  • PatFusty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Huh??? How does Israel lose money if there was peace??? I am curious to hear your opinion on what kind of revenues makes up Israel’s GDP and where instability of the Middle East fits into that.

      • PatFusty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        So the usual $5B in aid that Israel gets. You know Israels GDP was close to $600B last year right?

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          They had a budget surplus of less than $5b least year, so that money still makes a difference. Not sure if it’s just the usual $5b either right now, I didn’t go digging hard for it, but the data I saw for for much aid the US sends Israel was from before Oct.

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              US government gives $5b to various US weapons manufacturers who then send weapons to Israel, who then has weapons without needing to spend their own budget money on them, saving $5b.

              • PatFusty@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                What do they need this funding for again? Would they need this if there was peace?

                • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  They might. There’s peace because attacking is too dangerous (what they have now, at least with the nations not attacking them) vs peace because treaties are in place vs peace because no one wants to attack them. That middle one is risky because situations can change fast.

                  And there’s another angle that questions whether they wouldn’t need weapons during peace for less generous reasons.

                  • PatFusty@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    So in the ideal scenario where there is lasting peace with open borders and open trade… Why would Israel need funding? If anything the whole region would benefit from this I don’t understand why people think that the country NEEDS instability. They are doing well off as is with these problems and I would bet everything I would ever own that lasting peace would make their situation even more profitable.