• yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    You really think that infrastructure IT is dumb unless it can brush off a Stuxnet-like attack by the CIA and Mosad? Most RR traffic signals in the US are run with mechanical logic, physical switches connected to circuits closed by steel wheels on steel tracks. Do you really want a “move fast and break things” tech bro to update all this stuff for us?

    All kinds of infrastructure uses ancient software because it’s reliable. Updating it just to protect from hackers causing damage is likely to cause that damage unintentionally while doing little to protect from hackers anyhow.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Every SCADA related cyber attack and incident has entered the chat.

      Even if it’s archaic, a lot of these systems aren’t secure which can be done relatively easily and cheaply with things like basic firewalls and stunnel.

    • AMDIsOurLord
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Akshually it was recently found that a spy from Holland I think penetrated a chip supply line and installed an infected chip which found it’s way into the centrifuge network

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      uses ancient software because it’s reliable

      HAHAHA!

      I just have to laugh at that idea, since I’ve been using computers since the days that those OSes were in common use. Reliable is not what I would call a lot of that old stuff for sure.

      The bottom line is that ancient software will likely have ancient security vulnerabilities that would be trivial to exploit and take over or destroy those systems. It’s not good.