• hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’ve worked at both Facebook and Google, and I’d second this sentiment. It is pretty disgusting that anyone with a passable knowledge of how to hide their tracks can basically get all of the information (messages, posts, photos, private information) they want about you. Sure, they might get fired if they’re caught, and maaaaaaaybe (read: probably not) face legal action, but they can do a lot of damage beforehand. And if they’re good enough, they won’t get caught.

    I trust the people that I worked with there, but these are big organizations, and a lot more people than I would be comfortable with have essentially administrator access to private data.

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah. I work in IT as well. Not in a megacorp like Google or Facebook, but I’ve been in large private companies and government agencies that you would hope would have strict privacy and security policies. Guess what? They don’t.

      Nobody in a position of power cares beyond the point of legal requirements, which are mostly shit. It’s kind of like “military grade”; it sounds impressive, but what it actually means is “this is as cheaply made as possible while still meeting the bare minimum legal standard”.

      • Godort@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’ve gotten in actual arguments about how “military grade” means easy to replace, not durable

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        it sounds impressive, but what it actually means is “this is as cheaply made as possible while still meeting the bare minimum legal standard”.

        And for 5x the normal cost…

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      10 months ago

      Seems to me that if one was running a spy agency like, say, the CIA or something, it’d be a very useful move to get one of your employees to get a job at one of those companies, so that in addition to ones own spying, one could also piggyback off the spy infrastructure of the ad companies. I imagine the government might get some of that information already, but if you were a foreign government, or trying to get info you weren’t technically supposed to have, I can imagine it might make a lot of sense

      • Im_old@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        10 months ago

        They don’t need to “get someone on the inside”, they have been using FISA and Section 702 for decades. Plus the Prism project that got leaked by Snowden.

        • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah that works if it’s a company in your jurisdiction, but for countries like Russia it’s probably an easy win to just have someone on the inside who can look up whatever you want. Probably costs a lot less to maintain as well, if you’re after individual targets and not casting a wide net.

          • Im_old@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            Russia and China have their own versions of fb and similar services. And in any case, for domestic interception you do it via NSA, for foreign individuals you go through the CIA. Also, they bugged directly the under sea cables landing points.

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’d imagine many countries have spies working at all the big tech companies.

    • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      IMO it’s less about insiders stealing info. I’ve seen leads lists stolen and sold on the open market, etc. What we should really be concerned about is the above board, legal and absolutely promoted evil of advertising. I’ve worked in social Media and gaming(gambling) and let men tell you: the legal things these advertisers do are diabolical. The whiteboard conversations about how to structure a user journey are exploitation and immoral, unethical and downright evil and they are so by design. You’re doing a poor job if you’re not devising ways to skirt the law and use loopholes to manipulate people.

      • thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Can you say more about those whiteboard conversations? What exactly are they doing that’s unethical? I can speculate about dark patterns related to engagement and spend escalation, but I’m curious to hear your more informed perspective.

        • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Youre pretty accurate wrt dark patterns but there’s other stuff like user journeys that map out for instance how much and when to deliver a casino coupon to a user based on research into addictive behavioural patterns.

          Hypothetically: how does the glycemic index of typical lunch foods impact mood and when in that cycle is an addict most likely to succumb?

          Put it like this: if it can be done, it is being done.

          I had a promising career in Datascience very early on (2005 - this was before the CUDA framework was released) and I quickly realised that there was very little good that could come of that work under capitalism. I have friends who had aspirations in aerospace who realised that all they would end up building is weapons. Similar deal. I left it behind and I have a comfortable life in good old fashioned data management now. It isn’t sexy but I can sleep at night.

      • someacnt_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Doesn’t most people also manupulate each other as well? Like gaslighting and etc.

        • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Sure. Do they do that with the might of Googles advertising platform behind them? Do they do it to millions of people m at a time using automated processes supported but machine learning?

          • someacnt_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Irrelevant, manupulation requires lots of skill. I won’t be able to even if I tried.

    • pop
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      10 months ago

      yay! you worked at facebook and google well knowing they exploit people’s emotions and tech illiteracy. Do you want a cookie?

      I hope you’re working at Tiktok now. I can’t wait to praise you about how you tell everyone they’re exploiting teenagers and spying on them that we totally don’t know.  🕵️ 🕵️ 🕵️

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        This phrasing may have a chilling effect on discussions on our platform. I believe your opinion could still come through a statement which doesn’t attack the commenter as much - discouraging those who may have future job offers while not scaring commenters off in the future.