He’s the Anti-Christ in like every way. But he’s white, so it’s all good.
Yuck! At least Nicolae Carpathia from Left Behind was good looking and not an orange turd.
I’m not religious anymore but I still think that was a really cool science fiction series.
I never was very religious before being an atheist but the books were entertaining popcorn between Sword of Truth and Wheel of Time releases. It also helped my mom was reading them so I didn’t have to spend my money on the books. A lot of what I read at the time was because my mom read it.
Just for some context here. In the US, Christianity is everyday, more an identity than a religion. The “evangelicals” that support Trump overwhelmingly don’t attend services, don’t read the Bible, and don’t pray unless they’re in trouble. The evangelical movement has been cooped by the Republican party so thoroughly, that there isn’t much difference between conservative politics and Christian belief in the average worshiper’s mind. Christianity is the justification for having power, not the ethic of how to wield it.
I’m not playing “true Scotsman”, or trying to define what a Christian ought to be. I’m just posting this for the people who are mystified at the disconnect between the teachings of Jesus and the support for regressive and hateful politics.
It’s ironic that apotheoses of the individual, so central to modern conservative thought is antithetical to patriotism, faith, and family values.
The evangelical movement has been cooped by the Republican party so thoroughly
I would reverse that, it’s the republican party that has been taken over by the evangelicals. In the end it’s the same result though.
I would argue that Christianity has moved much further toward reactionary politics than the other way round. Evangelicals in the 70s were pro-choice for example. I’d also point out that reactionary politics is at a high water mark while Christianity is in decline.
There’s a trap in being a critic of religion that one tends to overestimate the power of faith.
Evangelicals in the 70s were pro-choice for example
now you’re just making shit up.
No, its true. Evangelicals have been massively radicalized by the right ever since the 80s. This Politico article goes over the history of the rise of the radical right, and they discuss how abortion was only used because it was more convenient than their actual goal. Some choice quotes (emphasis mine):
The history of that movement, however, is more complicated. White evangelicals in the 1970s did not mobilize against Roe v. Wade, which they considered a Catholic issue. They organized instead to defend racial segregation in evangelical institutions, including Bob Jones University.
The historical record is clear. In 1968, Christianity Today, the flagship magazine of evangelicalism, organized a conference with the Christian Medical Society to discuss the morality of abortion. The gathering attracted 26 heavyweight theologians from throughout the evangelical world, who debated the matter over several days and then issued a statement acknowledging the ambiguities surrounding the issue, which, they said, allowed for many different approaches.
“Whether the performance of an induced abortion is sinful we are not agreed,” the statement read, “but about the necessity of it and permissibility for it under certain circumstances we are in accord.”
Two successive editors of Christianity Today took equivocal stands on abortion. Carl F. H. Henry, the magazine’s founder, affirmed that “a woman’s body is not the domain and property of others,” and his successor, Harold Lindsell, allowed that, “if there are compelling psychiatric reasons from a Christian point of view, mercy and prudence may favor a therapeutic abortion.”
Meeting in St. Louis in 1971, the messengers (delegates) to the Southern Baptist Convention, hardly a redoubt of liberalism, passed a resolution calling for the legalization of abortion, a position they reaffirmed in 1974 — a year after Roe — and again in 1976.
When the Roe decision was handed down, W. A. Criswell, pastor of First Baptist Church in Dallas and sometime president of the Southern Baptist Convention, issued a statement praising the ruling. “I have always felt that it was only after a child was born and had a life separate from its mother that it became an individual person,” Criswell declared, “and it has always, therefore, seemed to me that what is best for the mother and for the future should be allowed.”
Hell, as noted later in the article, Falwell didn’t even start removed about abortion until like 5 years after Roe.
GOP is appropriating evangelical culture. In this timeline, Michael Rapaport is king.
(I know it’s a stretch but one person out there has to get this one, eh?)
I’m not playing “true Scotsman”, or trying to define what a Christian ought to be. I’m just posting this for the people who are mystified at the disconnect between the teachings of Jesus and the support for regressive and hateful politics.
I literally got called a communist by family members for actually acting the way they raised me, because apparently its communist to want to care about less well off people than yourself (and we weren’t even doing that well to start with…)
Odd, I was evangelical for 20 years and I remember them being at church weekly at least. Catholics are more the kind who don’t actually practice
No shit. Anyone not drunk on the Kool aid can easily see this, the dude is the devil incarnate, and an absolute moron.
deleted by creator
Fuck. That maths right. Very much.
Wait til you hear what the Evangelicals believe about the Jewish population occupying the holy land in relation to the Apocalypse…
Ok, I’ll wait
Sounds like genocide?
Looks like it today… But I think that’s a political factor in the US backing Israel today in spite of that genocide in progress.
Most evangelicals don’t have the ability to thoughtfully do something they think is evil for the greater good. They think that stealing to save someone’s life is a really tough problem. They just actually view him as the good guy.
points to Revelation to where the false prophet rises to unlimited power
Fuck.
Those red hats do seem to have a “mark of the beast” flair to them. They aren’t the permanent mark indicated in Revelation 13:16, but I think if you wear it every day it may as well be.
I’m not a Christian, but his followers certainly are. I wonder how they don’t see it?
The Bible also says the mark is required to do business, like buying food at the store. The similarities are interesting, but it’s not like you can’t apply many of them to other terrible leaders throughout history. And since Revelation is actually referring to Rome and Nero, it makes sense why the author is able to encapsulate the concept of “terrifying leader” so well.
But to your point, they don’t see it, because like everything in religion, you can pick and choose what you like. That’s why there’s so many sects of Christianity, and why at least one scholar calls Trump’s version “American Fundamentalism.” Trump is the messiah they’ve been waiting for.
They don’t see it, because they don’t want to.
It’s permanent in the sense that once someone sees you in it they’ll never look at you the same.
Omg totally. It’s like a brand. But not that kind, that it also is. Oh, snap. That’s the etymology of the modern use of the word… Huh… TIL as I type this…
But yeah, that describes how I viscerally respond to seeing it. They needn’t have the rest of their face if it were a 666 on the forehead, it’d be all you see. Same w the hats now. Face is irrelevant. Hat says enough.
I think they don’t see it because the people who support Trump and see him as a harbinger of prosperity are the same people who take the Bible at face value and are already of the belief that should the Rapture come tomorrow, they certainly won’t be left below.
They believe in the wrathful God of the Old Testament, they are fundamentalists and they are a far cry from what good Christians can be. Should Jesus come tomorrow, these people would have him lynched as a pinko liberal, labeling him the antichrist.
They’re not Christian because they have read the Bible and learned to love thy neighbor and become a righteous person, they are Christian because they have been told a lake of hellfire awaits those who don’t accept Jesus and they were indoctrinated into the religion of Revelations. They’ve been fed the cherry-picked apples of knowledge by pastors with agendas and never challenged the version of God they were given.
Trumps persecution by the state and mainstream politics fuels this fire. Surely if he were the antichrist he would not have been challenged by the DOJ and “anti-christian” liberals. In their minds, his path to the white house, as a leader of men, parallels Jesus.
My mother calls him ‘a man for such a time as this’. She references god using a donkey to minister to Paul and says ‘god can use anyone’. She acknowledges he’s not a Christian but still believes he’s the anointed one to lead the country and has prophecies about him, including one about him being assassinated IIRC.
The book of Revelations is purely about the Romans and more specifically about Nero. His name was coded as the number of the beast. The evangelistic types have twisted the story to be about the end of times or some future anti-christ but it was all just code talk about the time they were living in. They defined what an anti-christ would be like because the Roman Emperors were the real deal.
Er, howabout nothing supernatural, just a dying narcissist?
The main flaw in this article is that they’re comparing Trump’s book to God’s book, and both were ghostwritten.
Been saying that for 8 years.
Duh, moving on
Any “Christian” who supports Trump will undoubtedly burn in Hell for… <checks watch> …an eternity
No big deal
Don’t do that, they are Christians. These people are the ugly side to Christianity, own it and fix it, don’t push them off as “not real Christians” cause they very much are
They may think themselves to be “Christians”, however they are diametrically opposed to the teachings of Christ.
They will burn like dried cedar.
Isn’t the false prophet supposed to be well-spoken and physically attractive, though?
His base thinks he is.
Not necessarily, just that he’s loud and brash.
