Whose responsibility is it to protect unhoused when it’s freezing outside? An Ohio pastor opened his church to the homeless and was charged by city.

    • dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t know, we don’t want a shooting range next to a preschool or something. Zoning does some good.

      • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh come on. This is absolutely a government overreach… yes, regulations can be good. They were not in this case.

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Maybe I’m misunderstanding the situation, but it seems to me the problem here isn’t the zoning laws, but draconian enforcement during an emergency.

          Usually in times of hardship, anyone with half a brain knows not to strictly enforce laws like this that were clearly not intended to stop churches, businesses, or private individuals from helping people.

          It’s like charging someone for violating zoning by taking in neighbours whose homes were destroyed. In normal times, there are laws against turning yourself into a boarding house without a permit, but nobody reasonable would enforce that after a tornado.

          The problem is moronic enforcement.

          • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            The regulation/law could have been written better. That’s why I called it overreach. They could have written an emergency clause or wrote an emergency regulation/law that specified overruling certain laws.

            That’s what I meant by overreach. I’m generally pro regulations when it comes to safety which is what the sleeping and eating one I assume was written about.

      • LrdThndr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You mean like here in maryville, tn, where the new Smith and Wesson factory and test range shares a property line with Middlesettlements Elementary School?

        Nothing quite like kids hearing gunshots outside at school.

        And it wasn’t just “allowed” by zoning laws. The city basically did backflips to get the plant to move here. They even convinced the city of Alcoa to cede the land to the city of Maryville without telling Alcoa why they wanted it.

        Bunch of shady shit all around, but the whole county basically sucks Smith and Wesson’s dick now. They even had a big festival on the day the plant opened to celebrate it.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Wouldn’t a daycare/private preschool and a gun range both be the same light commercial zones?

        There might be regulation keeping you from owning a gun range near a school, but I don’t think zoning helps

      • maryjayjay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Seems like a shooting range next to a school could be a deterrent.

        Hmmm, which school to shoot up? This one next to a bunch of folks with weapons and ammo within arms reach practicing marksmanship or any of these other ones without that?