Grand jury in New Mexico charged the actor for a shooting on Rust set that killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins

Grand jury in New Mexico charged the actor for a shooting on Rust set that killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins

Actor Alec Baldwin is facing a new involuntary manslaughter charge over the 2021 fatal shooting of a cinematographer on the set of the movie Rust.

A Santa Fe, New Mexico, grand jury indicted Baldwin on Friday, months after prosecutors had dismissed the same criminal charge against him.

During an October 2021 rehearsal on the set of Rust, a western drama, Baldwin was pointing a gun at cinematographer Halyna Hutchins when it went off, fatally striking her and wounding Joel Souza, the film’s director.

Baldwin, a co-producer and star of the film, has said he did not pull the trigger, but pulled back the hammer of the gun before it fired.

Last April, special prosecutors dismissed the involuntary manslaughter charge against Baldwin, saying the firearm might have been modified prior to the shooting and malfunctioned and that forensic analysis was warranted. But in August, prosecutors said they were considering re-filing the charges after a new analysis of the weapon was completed.

    • chaogomu@kbin.social
      3·
      11 months ago

      The set was not meant to have any live ammo. It was a “cold” set.

      The live ammo actually came from the prop supply company, co-mingled with dummy rounds.

      The live rounds were re-loads into casings that would normally be dummy rounds, because a previous film used them to train the actors how to react to live fire from their guns.

      The live rounds were then turned over to the prop company at the end of that film, and at some point became co-mingled with dummy rounds and then sent out to the Rust film location.

      The armorer should have checked every dummy round. But didn’t even know how to do so. The re-loads were also slightly different looking than the standard dummy round. (red paint in the logo vs blue for the dummy)

      As a note, when questioned by police, the armorer didn’t even know the name brand of the dummy rounds.

      • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
        3·
        11 months ago

        I’m sorry. I don’t mean to sound rude. That didn’t address my question. I do appreciate all those facts gathered concisely.

        My question was more to the tune of: Did Baldwin have any reason to doubt the common assumption

        The set was not meant to have any live ammo. It was a “cold” set.

        It seems if the first Baldwin ever heard of this rule being broken was at the moment of the accident, then I can’t see how anyone argues that he should be accountable. But I was asking is there any paper trail or something where he was complaining about the armorer or something?

        • chaogomu@kbin.social
          3·
          11 months ago

          The set was cold.

          There was no reason anyone would have expected live rounds, because live rounds are legally banned on movie sets.

          Especially live rounds in Starline Brass casings, because Starline Brass doesn’t make live rounds, they only make dummy rounds.

          The bullet that Baldwin fired was from a Starline Brass casing, and had the logo on the end next to the primer.

          https://variety.com/2021/film/news/rust-investigators-live-rounds-alec-baldwin-1235122384/

          This has all been known for years. The round looked like a dummy, but was not.

          • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
            1·
            11 months ago

            You sound like you’re trying to convince me of something. I only asked a question. Just to be clear, is your answer “no”?

            • chaogomu@kbin.social
              1·
              11 months ago

              There are a lot of people in this thread who are ignoring reality, and thinking that a movie set is a gun range.

              So yeah. I’m basically saying the same thing over and over again.