The Defense Department will install solar panels on the Pentagon, part of the Biden administration’s plan to promote clean energy and “reestablish the federal government as a sustainability leader.”

The Pentagon is one of 31 government sites that are receiving $104 million in Energy Department grants that are expected to double the amount of carbon-free electricity at federal facilities and create 27 megawatts of clean-energy capacity while leveraging more than $361 million in private investment, the Energy Department said.

The solar panels are among several improvements set for the Pentagon, which also will install a heat pump system and solar thermal panels to reduce reliance on natural gas and fuel oil combustion systems

    • Nudding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because the US army is the number 1 polluter of all time. We’ve been through this.

        • Nudding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah they sure can! But they’re not… They’re continuing to increase their carbon footprint while making people like you feel good about a few solar panels lol.

          • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Yeah, because installing solar panels, getting more efficient HVAC aren’t steps…

            This isn’t all or nothing.

            • Nudding@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              They are microscopic steps in comparison to the leaps and bounds the US military makes in terms of CO2. You asked how it’s greenwashing, multiple people have explained it to you, either you understand it or you don’t.

                • Nudding@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Because they’re higher than yours? We’re literally heading full steam ahead into a climate apocalypse and you’re excited about some solar panels on a roof?

          • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Dude, this conversation is a great example of letting perfect being the enemy of good. Organization takes a step in the right direction, and wack jobs come out of the woodwork because it wasn’t a complete change that would have taken decades to finish

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              11 months ago

              Dude, this conversation is a great example of letting perfect being the enemy of good. Organization takes a step in the right direction, and wack jobs come out of the woodwork because it wasn’t a complete change that would have taken decades to finish

              We’ve been ‘accepting’ the good in earnest now for around 50-60 years under the modern global political hegemony. How is that going? Has the world been improving? We get bold decisive action when it relates to things that make life worse for all peoples, and we get incrementalism when it comes to actions which would improve peoples lives. This is the true cost of incrementalism. Its why the world is fucked. No. Halfway solutions aren’t good enough. In fact they are actually worse than no solution at all because the take the space and opportunity where a significant action can be made.

              • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                I hear what you are saying but it sounds like “Hey, we have a hole in this boat but instead of trying to stop most of the water from getting in, we’re just gonna let it sink, swim to shore and build a new boat.”

                • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Have you ever had a hole in your boat?

                  Guess what. If you don’t fully solve having a hole in your boat, you still have a hole in your boat.

                  You need to completely fix the fucking hole or you are well and truly fucked.

                  Taking the time to do a halfway repair instead of fully fixing the issue is how you end up at the bottom of the sea.

                  • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    I choose that, because I know what it takes to stop water coming in a boat, and sometimes all you can do is limit the ingress to a manageable level until you can sail into harbour to get proper maintenance.

                    You’re saying if you can’t patch the hole properly at sea, let it sink.

                  • queermunist she/her
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    But don’t the Titanic’s deck chairs look so nice now that we’ve rearranged them?