cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/10673163

Evidence shows that shoving data in peoples’ faces doesn’t work to change minds.

As a scientist heavily engaged in science communication, I’ve seen it all.

People have come to my public talks to argue with me that the Big Bang never happened. People have sent me handwritten letters explaining how dark matter means that ghosts are real. People have asked me for my scientific opinion about homeopathy—and scoffed when they didn’t like my answer. People have told me, to my face, that what they just learned on a TV show proves that aliens built the pyramids and that I didn’t understand the science.

People have left comments on my YouTube videos saying… well, let’s not even go there.

I encounter pseudoscience everywhere I go. And I have to admit, it can be frustrating. But in all my years of working with the public, I’ve found a potential strategy. And that strategy doesn’t involve confronting pseudoscience head-on but rather empathizing with why people have pseudoscientific beliefs and finding ways to get them to understand and appreciate the scientific method.

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s a good point, you just can’t expect empathy in return. That tends to wear you down, so I don’t really know what the answer is. Maybe picking your battles is important too.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Well yes. You don’t have to be a keyboard warrior, you can choose to see something you don’t agree with and just move on.

      It’s like people think downvotes will somehow change the mind of the person who is posting. It probably won’t. :)

      In the real world, people make their own decisions, no matter how much you click the downvote button. :)