• GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’m not telling you what I think, I’m telling you what they regularly do. No medical personnel are anywhere near this event.

    There must be a grey area because I’ve seen video from many conflicts where mortally wounded enemy combatants are dispatched. I’m aware of the technical law.

    Regarding what I do actually think, I think it’s morally “better” to dispatch the mortally wounded as it reduces suffering.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      There is a gray area: while engaging an enemy, you may not know exactly at what point have they been neutralized, so if you keep shooting and kill them… well, tough luck, should have surrendered sooner.

      These videos however, which show a clearly neutralized enemy, then go for a headshot… or the ones desecrating cadavers… or joking about civilian victims… make me think that whoever published them is either quite dim, or works for the other side.

      Earlier in the Ukrainian war, there were some much smarter moves, like filming POWs being given a phone to call their families. That’s both morally and strategically far better.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        As mentioned, I’ve strayed into my opinion now.

        I firmly believe they reduced suffering in the video. There was no one around, Russia is known for not recovering their wounded, he may well have laid there for hours until succumbing to hypothermia