2024 might be the breakout year for efficient ARM chips in desktop and laptop PCs.

    • corbin@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      RISC-V is also really exciting, yeah. I’m curious if it will have to go through the same slow progression in form factors that we saw with ARM (first embedded, then phones, then tablets, etc.) or if we’ll get high-performance RISC hardware more quickly.

    • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Hasn’t RISC been around since at least the 90s? How much more time do they really need if it’s ever going to be ready for desktops?

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        RISC-V dates from 2011. RISC processors have been around since the 1980s, and ARM processors (in all our mobile devices) are RISC processors. Apple Silicon (M1, M2, M3) is ARM-based so RISC is also in Macs, which proves it’s feasible in high-performing laptop and desktop computers. But the particular appeal of RISC-V is its open licensing.

    • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s years away though right? Even if we get some this year, they’ll be very immature. When you look at Arm based stuff, especially the Pi 5 and similar, it goes without saying that their time is now.

      • OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, you’re not wrong. I’m not saying it’s soon, there’s clearly a lot of work to be done in the space still, I’m just excited for unencumbered processor designs.

    • anlumo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      RISC-V is exciting for chip manufacturers, not sure why end users should be. I personally don’t care whether the CPU in my system required the producer to pay a license fee.