• rizoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I keep going back and forth with Firefox and Vivaldi. The chrome based browsers just tend to run better. I love firefox on mobile but on desktop it’s tougher for me to stick with. Also Mozilla seems to have a different goal for the future with all the other products and ai weirdness they recently announced.

      • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        9 months ago

        All chromium browsers are supporting Google’s grip on the internet.

        • rizoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          This is true. Which is why Mozilla needs to focus on making a better browser instead of adding their own ai bullshit.

          • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 months ago

            Mozilla has frequently pointed their efforts into the wrong direction. We need to politely encourage them to focus on the things that matter.

      • I’m in the exact same boat. Vivaldi devs are so open about everything they do that they’ve honestly earned my trust in their browser.

        No nonsense and very clear options to disable data collection despite being a chromium based browser. I love firefox mobile’s extensions but it just doesn’t have the same consistency between desktop and mobile. For example, Vivaldi mobile let’s you control site permissions to the level of controlling if they’re allowed to play sound or not

    • Lodra@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Serious question. Is it actually better for the typical user? I don’t mean people commenting here. I’m thinking about the majority that don’t care about privacy, blocking ads, quality technology, etc. for those people, I’m guessing that Firefox is equivalent. Just another browser that works fine. So why switch??

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I run into compatibility issues and weird bugs with firefox a lot. I’m still using it as my primary browser, but I have to keep a chromium based browser ready for times when a website won’t work in firefox. I can put up with that personally, but I wouldn’t want to set up firefox on family/friend computers because I don’t want to get a call whenever something doesn’t work and they don’t know why.

        Chrome based browsers also have some super useful features (like tab groups) that firefox doesn’t have a good alternative for.

        • Lodra@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          Interesting. I’ve heard this many times from people here on Lemmy. I’ve been running Firefox for ~6 months now (previously Brave) and haven’t seen these issues yet. I don’t even have a chromium based browser available on any of my devices.

          Regardless, I hear you about not wanting to be personal support for friends and family. That’s annoying

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            People inevitably bring up compatibility issues in Firefox when this subject comes up, and nobody ever has specific examples.

            • Spaz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Proxmox virtual machine server, v8.x the UI is funky and the console doesn’t display properly.

        • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          I run into compatibility issues and weird bugs with firefox a lot. I’m still using it as my primary browser, but I have to keep a chromium based browser ready for times when a website won’t work in firefox…

          Got any specific examples you don’t mind sharing? I can’t remember the last time I ran into this.

          • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Most recent one was visiting https://www.lifetime.com/playsets on Firefox mobile. After going back and forth between the list of playsets and individual playset pages, Firefox stopped loading the list of playsets. I would load in most of the page, but the actual product list wouldn’t load. Refreshing and restarting Firefox wouldn’t fix it, but the page loaded fine in brave browser so it didn’t appear to be a server issue.

            Before that one, I had a time where Firefox mobile was completely broken by an update for like a week. Wouldn’t load any web pages, reinstalling/resetting user data/etc wouldn’t fix it.

            I’ve had websites break on Firefox desktop too, but I don’t have any specific examples I can recall right now. I definitely run into more issues with Firefox mobile than desktop though.

            • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I definitely run into more issues with Firefox mobile than desktop though.

              Ah, mobile. I don’t use Firefox mobile due to its insecure status, particularly lack of sandboxing:

              Avoid Gecko-based browsers like Firefox as they’re currently much more vulnerable to exploitation and inherently add a huge amount of attack surface. Gecko doesn’t have a WebView implementation (GeckoView is not a WebView implementation), so it has to be used alongside the Chromium-based WebView rather than instead of Chromium, which means having the remote attack surface of two separate browser engines instead of only one. Firefox / Gecko also bypass or cripple a fair bit of the upstream and GrapheneOS hardening work for apps. Worst of all, Firefox does not have internal sandboxing on Android. This is despite the fact that Chromium semantic sandbox layer on Android is implemented via the OS isolatedProcess feature, which is a very easy to use boolean property for app service processes to provide strong isolation with only the ability to communicate with the app running them via the standard service API. Even in the desktop version, Firefox’s sandbox is still substantially weaker (especially on Linux) and lacks full support for isolating sites from each other rather than only containing content as a whole. The sandbox has been gradually improving on the desktop but it isn’t happening for their Android browser yet.

              Source: https://grapheneos.org/usage#web-browsing

        • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          This was the case back when Chrome was starting out too. Everything was made for IE and you’d have to keep it around for the odd time you needed it.

          Eventually those old sites were replaced and now Chrome is the new de facto standard.

      • diffcalculus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        For the overwhelming majority of users, they won’t know the difference between using the two. People here are on a high inhaling the air in this echo chamber.

        I’ve used Chrome on every device imaginable since Chrome was a thing. I’ve had a negligible amount of problems, in all my years. I absolutely hate that Google shuts services down when they get bored. And I absolutely hate what they did with Google Music and Google Chats, and Domains.

        I move off Google services when they shut down. Besides that, I’ve no problems with the ones I use (minus nitpicks and the above products).

        So to anyone here feeling bad and are afraid to comment on here because they don’t want to lose Internet points, fret not. There are millions of us perfectly satisfied using Google, PAYING for their services where we see fit, and generally not worrying at all about any of this.

        • anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          What about the ad blocker changes they’re making? That’s pretty much the line for me. I use chrome everywhere but when ublock stops working well that’ll be me jumping ship. The web is a fucking unreadable cesspool without a solid adblocker running.

          • diffcalculus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            The adblock changes is a shit stain, absolutely agree with you there.

            For my household, personally, it won’t make a difference because I have a pihole blocking everything from all devices. So that change isn’t enough to persuade me to make a move.

            But yes, anyone who doesn’t have pihole of and uses adblockers, it will be 100% understandable for them to jump ship.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Some websites load faster in Chrome. But the reason why Chrome is so ubiquitous is because for normal people, Google is still the plucky user friendly company they were in the early 00s.

    • leaskovski@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      To be fair, chromebooks are great devices for kids, and the family link platform makes keeping them “secure”, easier… a lot easier!!!

        • leaskovski@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          It grinds me a bit, as I did have a Linux version if Firefox installed on my Chromebook, but because the book is just a sofa device and doesn’t get any love (especially from the little shits), it runs dog slow, so I end up just using chrome on it, and suffer the pain of not having things synced between devices. Thankfully the most important thing, bitwarden is syncing, so I can manage the suffering.

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Firefox is better on desktop, but on mobile it still sucks, sometimes it is even refusing to load websites.

    • people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      No lie, I actually had to shift to Chrome from Firefox today. Some websites are straight-up broken on Firefox, while others load painfully slow (e.g. try arc.net on Firefox vs any Chromium-based browser). Not to mention the massive shame of Mozilla leadership treating its own flagship product as a second-class citizen in favour of “AI initiatives” or whatever the fuck those C-suites want to stud into their resumes.

    • corus_kt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I work at a small company - absolutely everything from work macros, accounts and shortcuts are all intertwined in Chrome, they’ve been using it like that for ten years - it’d be faster for me to find a new job then to unclog that mess from the entire office. I still installed firefox for personal use though.

      • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        in my previous job we were allowed to install some old version of firefox through the companys own portal. but we couldn’t access internet with it because “firefox is vulnerable”. they use google suite so chrome was the default browser, but edge worked too and even IE…

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Because normies were using IE, then enough of them had their “tech enthusiast” grandson show them Chrome in 2010 and now that’s all they use.

    • Allah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      some small problems i face is that

      while i use youtube it runs slower.

      and the quick image search feature using google lens is not present.

      and telegram voice call does not work.

      • DePietPiraat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        You can use a different frontend for YouTube. You’ve got Freetube for pc, Yattee for MacOS and iOS and piped on any platform. These solutions also protect your privacy and block ads.

        • Wannade@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          My problem with these is that the quality is always bad. Usually 720p max and only H.264 instead of VP9. YouTube quality is already bad enough as it is and nerfing it even more feels awful.

    • Jako301@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Firefox is not the better browser in anything but privacy. Maybe it could win in customisability, but that’s something only a few percent of users care about.

      It has longer load times and sometimes breaks sites entirely while using about the same resources. Yes, the reason for that is that website creators don’t deliberately support it, but the normal user only cares about functionality.

      I still use it and recommend it to anyone that asks, but saying that it’s the better browser is just delusional.

  • shrugal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I’ve been removing Google services from my life bit by bit over the past year, and I have to say it is crazy how hard it actually is! They have inserted themselves into so many digital workflows, securing monopoly positions and preventing the rise of competitors and open ecosystems. In many areas the only alternatives are other tech giants, or accepting feature downgrades and having to set things up manually.

    I’m really glad that the browser is one area where the transition is actually very simple and straightforward!

    • slumberlust@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      What lessons have you learned so far? I’ve switched to FF and DDG with great results, but still use Gmail/android/photos.

      • 0x69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I urge you to check out Kagi Browser[1]. I forgot how pain-free using a search engine could be. With Google, a relatively simple search had me typing:

        sink tap gasket intitle:"replacement" OR intitle:"repair" filetype:pdf OR filetype:doc inurl:product OR inurl:details "made in" (site:.com OR site:.co.uk OR site:.de) -site:amazon.com -site:ebay.com

        I am appreciative that I’ve gotten pretty good at finding obscure nuggets of info, and it makes Google Dork[2] searches even more fun, but when I simply need “where to by $x”, Google shat out mindless SEO content.

        I also highly recommend Fastmail[3] as an alternative email host. Far cheaper than Google Workspace for custom domains, and their masked email function is wonderful, even more so with 1Password[4].

        Turning your back from the abusive Google can look intimidating to begin with, but it turns out it takes very little effort if you make a lil’ plan of alternative services to use.

        1. https://kagi.com/
        2. https://www.exploit-db.com/google-hacking-database
        3. https://www.fastmail.com/
        4. https://1password.com/fastmail/
          • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s a darn shame, I just paid for a month of Kagi to try them out.

            Saying “Politics finding its way into tech is one of the reason we do not have innovation any more.” instead of answering the question is a way to dodge a question you don’t want to answer. Super duper red flag. Unfortunate. I don’t think I can even trust that their search results aren’t biased.

        • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          1password rocks big time, AND it’s Canadian!

          It even has a Linux desktop application to integrate with system authentication and the CLI for SSH keys.

      • shrugal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The biggest thing is probably that you’ll have to pay for things if you want something that’s ethical and preserves your privacy, either a paid service or some initial investment into self-hosting (what I did). It’s 100% worth it imo though, being mostly free from big tech feels really nice!

        More specifically, I can highly recommend getting a Synology NAS and your own domain name. They have great replacements for many Google apps, and you can also try out open source alternatives with Docker.

        • Based_and_Cool@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’ve been using gmx which is a free EU email service with encryption paid for through ads but they don’t harvest data and I just use IMAP into my nextcloud email app

      • qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Cannot recommend Immich enough as a self-hosted Photos alternative. Obviously not a drop in replacement, and if you don’t want to self-host it’s not really feasible. But it is just awesome.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      How many google services do you have? I just have one, and if I ever deleted it, all of the google apps I use would become worthless.

    • 0x2d
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      i switched to calyx os yesterday and i love it already!

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      You need to have effective replacements.

      This is why Apple is so popular… much more thoroughly integrated, in many cases a better product, and for the most part paying more than just lip service to privacy.

      About the only Google services I still use is the search engine (while it is still marginally useful), and Maps (since so many people on FB Marketplace also use it, so sending an address using a maps link is the ideal solution).

      • doyoulikemyparka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I tried and just not having grouped tabs is so painful. That and being embedded in Google’s federated system makes it hard to get out. Any advice on how to make the switch in the least painful way?

    • jungle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I have to restart it once or twice each day as it refuses to play videos or audio after a while. I know it’s not a settings or add-on issue, and I searched everywhere for an explanation. It fucking sucks. I’m this close to going back to Chrome.

      • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        If you’re the only one who has that issue, or it’s very uncommon, then it’s more likely a software or hardware configuration issue or some corruption on your systems part.

        Just saying this, when I used to run windows, weird bugs like that as a cue to do a complete reinstall of windows. Usually would fix every problem I’d been having with every app to date.

        Even now deleting everything associated to Firefox and reinstalling the app would probably fix it. The other thing to do is to keep an eye on the behaviour of your browser after installing extensions. Sometimes extensions themselves can cause weird problems.

    • jeremyparker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      There are a couple tiny issues I have with it that drive me nuts (namely: 1 how they implement the CSS blur filter sucks and 2 the fact that they haven’t implemented page transitions even though I think it was their idea to start with (?))

      But other than those things, I certainly don’t feel like I’m missing anything by ditching Google.

  • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah, I’ll never use Chrome again. Google has always been shady, but this latest round of anti-features is unbelievable. I’m shocked there’s been no anti-trust suits related to what they’re doing with Chrome. Firefox is just a better browser with way more security options and extension support. That alone is enough for me to stick with it.

      • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Me, a foss contributer choosing edge because it’s a more convenient browser 🤷‍♂️

        Shit like this is why it’s 25 years later and we’re still joking about year of the Linux desktop.

        At some point just accept your objectives are mutually exclusive.

        • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          More power to you! Edge isn’t bad, it just has bad affiliations. I’ll keep using Firefox though :^)

            • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yup. I’m just saying that Edge is no worse than Chrome, Vivaldi, Opera, etc. that all use the same Google-controlled rendering engine.

              As a web dev, you do have to test against the Chromium engine, and in that context, Edge is not inherently worse than Chrome itself.

    • driveway@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Security? No. Privacy? Of course (assuming you don’t use vanilla FF). Is it much easier to escape the sandbox in Gecko than Chromium. Doesn’t matter what options they give you in the settings titled “Security”.

    • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      lmao at the thought of mozilla suing microsoft. Basically no resources vs functionally infinite resources, they would stand no chance at all. I don’t know if you’ve noticed but our legal system is based on a variation of might vs right, we could call it rich vs removed for convenience

  • ExLisper@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    “But Chrome is slightly more convenient! Why would I suffer tiny inconvenience today in order to save me from way greater inconvenience later? Who am I? Some reasonable person?” - typical Chrome user.

    • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      As a former chrome user it’s so real. Chrome connects every device for you and once you ARE in the loop it’s hard to leave it. Wanna switch to Firefox? Oops suddenly your authentication doesn’t work anymore. Oh what about those useful Google logins tied to everything now? Good luck with that.

      It took me huge effort to switch off chromium based browsers because the longer you use chrome, the more it worms it’s way into all your services making it harder and harder to switch. I still can’t figure out how to seperate my Yahoo account from my Gmail account

      A huge reason I left is realising that if google decided I broke their TOS on something like say, YouTube ad blocking, they can just terminate by Google account and every service attached to it suddenly becomes unusable. I’d rather not be taken hostage like that

      Edit: for all the wise people in the comments. I was trying to decouple entirely from Google products, not just chrome

      • ExLisper@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 months ago

        What you’re describing sounds more like over-reliance on Google services than the browser. I don’t use gmail or google logins anywhere, I just have Bitwarder plugin to manage my authentication and use masked emails to create accounts. I did the same in all the different browsers I used over the years and never had any issues with it or with switching between browsers.

      • hersh@literature.cafe
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        Firefox syncs across devices as well, if you sign up for a Firefox account and enable sync. This works for bookmarks, logins, history, and you can even access remote tabs if you want. It’s also easy to send a single page from one device to another.

        On desktop, Firefox has an import feature that will pull your bookmarks and logins m other browsers (like Chrome) into your Firefox profile.

        Even if you’re neck-deep in Google services, Chrome doesn’t do anything special.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Even if you’re neck-deep in Google services, Chrome doesn’t do anything special.

          Actually, being able to cast to other devices is very easy to do with Chrome, but extremely hard to impossible to do with Firefox, unfortunately.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        what about those useful Google logins tied to everything now? Good luck with that.

        What? You can still use your Google account without Chrome…

        Unless you’re not talking about OAuth. Is it Chrome’s password manager? Because I’m pretty sure that’s easily exportable…

    • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      We can’t forget that a lot of people have absolutely no idea that this is happening or what it means. Many folks just think the Chrome icon is how you access the internet and have no idea that there are other options. Helping to educate those folks is going to be a significant part of minimizing Chrome’s dominance.

  • thejodie@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve used Firefox for years. It’s always been the underdog imo.

    If it ever becomes the top dog, I’ll switch! To the next privacy underdog. More competition is good.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      FF has always been security conscious and was actually the big dog until around 2007 or so when they had to do a full rebuild of their code and this made it so that a lot of peoples’ favorite plugins stopped working until they were updated. This coincided with when Chrome started to become bigger and people switched. Now people are switching back. I use a combination of FF and Opera GX.

      • chrisgestapo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        IIRC they switched to webextensions in Firefox 57 in 2017. Even before that it was never the browser with the biggest market share, and Chrome had already got a huge market share in 2017.

        I’ve been using Phoenix/Firebird/Firefox as my default browser since 2003. Never understood the appeal of Chrome.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Even before that it was never the browser with the biggest market share

          Between 2005 and 2007 it sort of felt like that for me. All kinds of computer-illiterate people were switching to Firefox.

          I actually remember when Chrome first became a thing, I tried it then, used for some time as something cool, and then got back to Opera.

      • alekwithak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        FF was definitely the top dawg through the last half of the aughts. People got frustrated with the constant updates. Chrome had a lot of hype and for a while was the slick new browser. It didn’t take long for it to get just as slow as FF used to be, but now more enterprise web-apps will cripple compatibility on non-chromium browsers so it doesn’t matter how good FF gets.

      • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I was one of the users who left because TabMixPlus stopped working. Never worked again, so I’m with Vivaldi. I know; it’s built on Chromium, but being able to have my tabs on the bottom of the window is worth it for me.

    • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      At one point it was the top dog - this was before google was even in the browser market mind you. Then they entered and used a lot of… Shall we say interesting marketing practices to usurp firefoxes dominant position - it wasn’t all due to chrome being better.

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve read so many bs paid-off articles recently how chrome is so much better than firefox, or firefox has nothing left to give to its users

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I agree it’s BS, but how do you know they’re “paid off”? What’s an example of one that was “paid off”?

    • trent@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Google recently revised that motto, it now has a comma after the first word.

  • zingo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Well of course. Now all your traffic goes through proxies to Google’s servers for analytics.

    100℅ data harvesting.

    Genius move by Google. Even calls it a security/privacy measure!

    They will succeed too. Most of the human race are Neanderthals anyway. Couldn’t care less.

    • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Please don’t with this tech elitest stuff. Yeah, most people will continue to use chrome because they don’t really understand the gravity of what it means for their privacy, doesn’t mean we can’t do our best to help them out.

      • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s like oil dependency, we could blame the individual but that really doesn’t help the situation. Unless of course we’re talking about individual executives, those bastards are totally culpable.

      • squeakycat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well said. Contempt for the average user makes it easy to forget one’s humanity.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      You did so well until the last few sentences. Casually throwing everyone under the bus as idiots isn’t a great move.

      To be blunt, there’s a lot of tech noobs out there that have always been, and will always be, fairly bad with technology. There’s an even larger number that can’t be bothered to pay attention or care about it. And finally, there’s the enthusiasts and the tech savvy, most of whom are working in a tech related field (or want to). Special shout out to the enthusiasts who don’t work in a tech field who are still quite savvy. But let’s face it, the enthusiasts and the tech savvy are a minority. We are not their targets. Fact is, even if you’re using Google’s various services or Chrome or whatever, the tech literate are at least aware of what’s happening, and a nontrivial number of them are here. Including you and I.

      It then becomes our job to save others from themselves and get them away from the products looking to harm them. Throwing in the towel and calling everyone neaderthals isn’t the way to accomplish this. If we all do our part, we can save those we care about from becoming yet another battery in the machine, with all their data flowing through one company. It’s our duty.

      For those that REALLY want to help, get involved in local politics and be the change. Help push regulation on the corporate shills that want it all. Whether that’s running for office, or contacting your local representative or whatever, it’s something that should be done. They shouldn’t be allowed to just implement, what is essentially mass surveillance on the world without someone doing something about it. That’s what the government is supposed to be there to do. I’ll reserve my comments about how effective they’ve been in the past or how corrupt the whole system is, because that will vary from country to country. But bluntly, you can be that change by getting involved.

      As to the comments about the general idiocy of the population of earth, I say this: do you know it all? Well, neither do they. Nobody does. Can you fix your car and then turn around and frame a shed from scratch? Me neither. Can you perform experiments to discover new and exciting things in quantum physics, then build a toaster from raw materials? Me neither. Can you fix your plumbing, then create a program in Pascal that does your taxes for you? Me neither. Everyone has their skills, talents and expertise. Simply because there is a large percentage of people whose expertise is not tech, doesn’t, and shouldn’t, invalidate their intelligence as an individual.

      Check yourself, or the next time you have a problem you don’t know how to fix, people might just throw in the towel on helping you.

  • FerbFletcher@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ironically, in the past year, one of my employers specifically disallowed Firefox due to a CVE, saying that we were to use Chrome. A Cybersecurity professional once told me that Firefox is frowned upon because of CVEs.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m glad I’m in a position to basically never have to touch a chrome or chrome derivative for my work. It was a necessary evil to finally kill internet explorer, but these days it’s just hostile to its users.