Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft said that while he didn’t want to do it, he had to remind people of how “severe” the situation is.

A top Republican official in Missouri is threatening to remove President Joe Biden from appearing on the ballot as retaliation for the determination in two other states that Donald Trump doesn’t qualify because he “engaged in insurrection.”

“What has happened in Colorado & Maine is disgraceful & undermines our republic,” Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft wrote on the social media site X on Friday. “While I expect the Supreme Court to overturn this, if not, Secretaries of State will step in & ensure the new legal standard for @realDonaldTrump applies equally to @JoeBiden!”

Ashcroft’s post came shortly after the Supreme Court agreed to review a decision by Colorado’s high court that found Trump could be barred from the state’s primary ballot because of his actions leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

  • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s like if you assaulted someone, and then claiming you didn’t assault them because you think assault isn’t strongly defined.

    It’s just a very stupid and slimy way of saying you think laws shouldn’t apply to you.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, assault is strongly defined with a large amount of case law to back it up. It is also obvious who committed it.

      Violent storming of the Capitol is insurrectionalist and obvious (like assault)

      Incitement to insurrection is lacking in case law, and open to interpretation.

      I don’t know why you think this law is applicable to me personally.

      • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Violent storming of the Capitol is insurrectionalist and obvious (like assault)

        That was not your original statement but it’s a lot more correct now, and if we can agree that an obvious insurrection is an insurrection, that’s a very good start.

        We fight like hell. And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore

        I don’t see any honest case to be made that this isn’t incitement of insurrection.

        Additionally, the 14th Amendment does not require you to prove it was an incitement, it’s enough to provide aid or comfort to the insurrectionists. Of which there are numerous examples, including Trump repeatedly offering to pardon the insurrectionists.