He’s not alone: AOC and others have argued lawmakers should be paid more in order to protect against corruption and make the job more accessible.

  • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you want your politicians to be loyal to a country, you pay them. If you want them to be loyal to corporate interests, you let the corporations pay them. It is obvious the path the US has chosen. Contrast that with Singapore for an example of paying your elite government officials an actual salary and how corruption drops to zero.

    • SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s the same logic as prople saying we should keep the churches tax free, so they don’t interfere in politics, even thoigh they’re tax free now and already interfering with politics.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Whereas in America, we could pay them millions and there’d still be constant grift. This country has lost any sense of accountability. Too goddamn individualist.

      • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        The problem is you don’t pay them very much comparatively and so they take bribes and “gifts” to make up for the salary. Just look at Clarance Thomas. He said he needed a raise or he’d go full on corrupt. He did not get a raise. He went full corrupt.

        • Alto@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Or we could, yknow, actually prosecute the corrupt ones. Likely a pipedream, but there is another option besides overpay them or allow blatant corruption.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Likely a pipedream, but there is another option besides overpay them or allow blatant corruption.

            Yeah. We can do what we do now. Overpay them and allow blatant corruption.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          The problem is you don’t pay them very much comparatively and so they take bribes and “gifts” to make up for the salary.

          They do this no matter how much money we waste on them.

          • Windex007@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            I hear your point, and it might be true, but it’s only a hypothesis because, in the grand scheme of things, they aren’t paid well relative to other work with significantly lower amounts of responsibility.

            A young software developer working at Netflix or Amazon would be making more than them. A Congress person in a whole foods in silicon valley could very easily be the poorest customer in the store.

            Scarface said “First you get the money, then you get the power, then you get the women”. I believe that this is the American dream, at least in the eyes of people who end up in high government.

            Their path is different though, power comes first, THEN the money, THEN the women. If we paid them at least enough to enable sexy affairs, I think they could round out the three without as much incentive to go full on corrupt

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              We could enlist a corp of hot young women from all over the world , and bring them to a private island ….

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I hear your point, and it might be true, but it’s only a hypothesis because, in the grand scheme of things, they aren’t paid well relative to other work with significantly lower amounts of responsibility.

              “We should pay these corrupt pieces of shit even more money, and maybe they’ll stop taking bribes” is a hypothesis we’ve tested PLENTY of times. The results are conclusive: the people we put into office are overpaid at any price, and are corrupt no matter how much money we waste on them.

              • Windex007@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                When has this hypothesis been tested in the USA?

                Where are these conclusive results you speak of?

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  When has this hypothesis been tested in the USA?

                  Every single time we gave them a raise.

                  Where are these conclusive results you speak of?

                  They’re still corrupt.