When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, it claimed to be removing the judiciary from the abortion debate. In reality, it simply gave the courts a macabre new task: deciding how far states can push a patient toward death before allowing her to undergo an emergency abortion.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit offered its own answer, declaring that Texas may prohibit hospitals from providing “stabilizing treatment” to pregnant patients by performing an abortion—withholding the procedure until their condition deteriorates to the point of grievous injury or near-certain death.

The ruling proves what we already know: Roe’s demise has transformed the judiciary into a kind of death panel that holds the power to elevate the potential life of a fetus over the actual life of a patient.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    The economy has vastly improved

    Meh…

    The wealthy are wealthier, everyone else is worse off.

    And those economy gains are mostly from record breaking fossil fuels, and if you haven’t noticed, the climate isn’t exactly doing great.

    In that example Biden isn’t failing to pull the chute, he strapped on a jet pack and hit the gas pointing straight at the ground.

    Queer people are not as scared and us parents of them are not as scared (although scared of what could happen this year).

    Have you ever even talked to someone who is transgendered? Shit isn’t exactly going great for that demographic.

    Hell, even just for women. Abortion is kind of a big deal. Biden could" have used those two years to codify abortion, instead he did absolutely nothing.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Meh…

      The wealthy are wealthier, everyone else is worse off.

      No. Everyone is not worse off. That’s simply false. The economy was in free-fall when Trump left office and unemployment was sky-high. Yes, prices are higher now and that is not good, but people can now afford to pay for food because they have jobs.

      And those economy gains are mostly from record breaking fossil fuels, and if you haven’t noticed, the climate isn’t exactly doing great.

      Okay? That would have been the case regardless.

      Have you ever even talked to someone who is transgendered? Shit isn’t exactly going great for that demographic.

      Yes I have, and it was much worse under Trump.

      https://www.hrc.org/news/the-list-of-trumps-unprecedented-steps-for-the-lgbtq-community

      Biden could" have used those two years to codify abortion

      How? Exactly how could he have achieved this? Please detail it.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Giving Biden credit for more jobs after the pandemic is like saying Bill Clinton’s pro corporate policies caused the dotcom boom…

        Or that it was his over zealous crackdown on nonviolent offenders that caused the decline in crime rate and not the normal effect of banning leaded gas decades earlier, something that we saw across the globe on the same timeline after they banned it.

        You’re doing the same thing Republicans do, giving credit to your “team” for things that would have happened anyways.

        And waaaaaay over exaggerating how much got fixed.

        How? Exactly how could he have achieved this? Please detail it.

        How does anything get made a law?

        We had two years where Dems controlled the House, Senate, and presidency…

        If you’re saying it’s not Bidens fault nothing got done, how is it he’s the one that got literally anything else done?

        You’re making it out to be Biden has zero power, but you just gave him credit for increasing fossil fuels production?

        Is there any logic behind this to you? Or are you just saying every good the ng is only because of Biden, and every bad thing is something he couldn’t do.

        Who honestly believes that?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          We had two years where Dems controlled the House, Senate, and presidency…

          No. We had two years where Dems controlled the House and the Presidency and were challenged at every move by Sinema and Manchin. What specifically would have convinced Sinema and, especially, Manchin to agree to codify abortion? Because, if you weren’t aware, the Democrats did try to codify abortion and Manchin specifically blocked it.

          So what should they have done to convince Manchin? Or do you think they could have convinced a Republican to take their side? Because I sure as hell don’t.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            and were challenged at every move by Sinema and Manchin

            I’d take that as an excuse if Biden hasn’t spent the whole primary and election telling us that he can get dem legislation thru a Republican Senate…

            Then we (luckily) end up with 50 D senators, and Biden told us it was pointless to try.

            That doesn’t really change anything, because Biden was already expecting to have to fight a Republican Senate and get a couple votes.

            Hell, the whole reason we got 50 was the GA runoff when Biden was still saying 50 D’s would be enough to pass the whole platform.

            Do you think Joe “Senate whisperer” Biden just didn’t know who Manchin was?

            If so, why couldn’t he still get those few R votes he promised he could get?

            • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              So it’s Biden’s fault that republicans are opposing anything the democrats are doing?

              You’re playing right into their game with that kind of thinking.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                It’s my fault for listening to what Biden said he could?

                I should have known he would blatantly lie to get elected and then immediately act like I’m an idiot for thinking what he said was true?

                But also…

                This time I should listen to Biden and it totally won’t happen again…

                Have you ever thought about why voter turnout goes down for incumbents?

                • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Not always.

                  Trump got more votes in 2020 than he did in 2016 and there’s no reason to believe Biden isn’t going to get more considering it’s an exact repeat.

                  Biden has been fixing Trump’s dumpster fire and most reasonable people can see that.

                  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Total votes almost always go up due to population increase over the last 4 years…

                    When people talk about turnout, we’re talking about percent of eligible voters.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Then we (luckily) end up with 50 D senators, and Biden told us it was pointless to try.

              They literally tried. Did you even read my link?

            • prole@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Manchin isn’t even a Democrat anymore, and even before he made that official, it was already de facto true.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago
                1. So you’re saying even tho it was obvious, Biden and his people didn’t see it coming?

                2. How does that change Bidens presumption that it would be a Republican Senate?