• set_secret@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I largely agree with you. Blaming individuals is often a deflection from larger industrial responsibilities. Yes, consumer choices matter, but the real heavyweight is industrial emissions. And oh, the irony of the ‘eco-friendly’ vegan industry churning out carbon-intensive faux meats. It’s less about what’s on the plate and more about who’s cooking the books.

    • usernamesAreTricky
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Plant-based foods of any kind are dramatically lower in nearly every environmental metric. They are not carbon-intensive at all

      If I source my beef or lamb from low-impact producers, could they have a lower footprint than plant-based alternatives?The evidence suggests, no: plant-based foods emit fewer greenhouse gases than meat and dairy, regardless of how they are produced.

      […]

      Plant-based protein sources – tofu, beans, peas and nuts – have the lowest carbon footprint. This is certainly true when you compare average emissions. But it’s still true when you compare the extremes: there’s not much overlap in emissions between the worst producers of plant proteins, and the best producers of meat and dairy.

      https://ourworldindata.org/less-meat-or-sustainable-meat

      EDIT: I should also mention the emissions also mostly come from what’s produced rather than in differences in things like transportation, processing, etc.

      Transport is a small contributor to emissions. For most food products, it accounts for less than 10%, and it’s much smaller for the largest GHG emitters. In beef from beef herds, it’s 0.5%.

      Not just transport but all processes in the supply chain after the food leaves the farm – processing, transport, retail, and packaging – mostly account for a small share of emissions.

      https://ourworldindata.org/food-choice-vs-eating-local