• davelA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Yeah unfortunately Public’s copy of the same article is also behind Substack’s hard paywall, and Dem-aligned corporate media of course aren’t going to be interested in reporting on it.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The whole paywall thing is becoming a serious barrier to information access. This also lends itself to subtle abuse and censorship because new agencies can paywall content they want to suppress. So technically they’re still reporting on it, but majority of people won’t see it.

      • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Or clever grifters can post content to entice a gullible demographic into paying for some confirmation for their beliefs.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Seems like the only gullible demographic here are the people who still believe in Russiagate given all the evidence to the contrary. Turns out grifters didn’t even have to make them pay a single penny to confirm their biases.