canpolat@programming.dev to Actually Useful AI@programming.devEnglish · 10 months agoAI-generated articles prompt Wikipedia to downgrade CNET’s reliability ratingarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1333arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1333arrow-down1external-linkAI-generated articles prompt Wikipedia to downgrade CNET’s reliability ratingarstechnica.comcanpolat@programming.dev to Actually Useful AI@programming.devEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square12fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.zip
minus-squareSubArcticTundralinkfedilinkarrow-up12·10 months agoAgreed. There’s a difference between using AI to assist workers and using it to replace them outright
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down4·10 months agoIf it was actually AI (or good) it’d be different. I’m ashamed of millennial gamers for not forcing the terminology to be VI. Did we learn nothing from Mass Effect?
minus-squarefunnystuff97@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·edit-210 months agoIt’s a marketing thing. Calling LLM’s “AI” was a very intentional move, to evoke that sense of hyperintelligence. Whether it’s truly an artifical intelligence up for debate, but calling them AI absolutely helped them gain attention (good and bad). Also, obligatory “shut up Avina”.
Agreed. There’s a difference between using AI to assist workers and using it to replace them outright
If it was actually AI (or good) it’d be different.
I’m ashamed of millennial gamers for not forcing the terminology to be VI. Did we learn nothing from Mass Effect?
It’s a marketing thing. Calling LLM’s “AI” was a very intentional move, to evoke that sense of hyperintelligence. Whether it’s truly an artifical intelligence up for debate, but calling them AI absolutely helped them gain attention (good and bad).
Also, obligatory “shut up Avina”.