• Ephera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Personally, I found it particularly damning, how generic all of it was. They had a really interesting, diverse world with Morrowind. Then Oblivion was already a severe step backwards with relatively generic high fantasy. And Skyrim felt even more samey to me.

    Well, and now with Starfield, I already start sleeping when I hear the name. What is it supposed to be? Astrology Astronomy Simulator 2024? Did really no one in that management meeting have a better idea for the premise other than that it’s Fallout in space?

    To some degree, obviously it’s not supposed to be fantasy, so maybe they’ll actually be more creative with that, again, but with them now belonging to Microsoft, too, I just fully expect design by committee.

    • ampersandrew@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Did you play Starfield? It’s definitely got plenty of ideas. It just chickened out of some of them and wrote checks it couldn’t cash for others. (Also, I think you meant astronomy, not astrology.)

      • Primarily0617@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        All the new ideas in Starfield fall into one of two categories:

        • The technology doesn’t exist to implement it.
        • The talent at Bethesda is incredibly ill-suited to implement it.

        The Bethesda response to fans saying their main storyline was trash was to make a game where the main storyline is the primary focus and draw of the game? That’s a bold move.

        The NG+ stuff is a cool idea, but again, Bethesda just fundamentally lacks the talent to implement it. You can’t hit what they were aiming for with a handful of gimmicks. I wouldn’t even trust the team behind New Vegas, or whoever writes at Larian, to do it justice.

        • ampersandrew@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          I would absolutely trust Obsidian to handle the NG+ angle that Bethesda was aiming for, because they would have known that the right way to do it is to not let you do every faction’s quest line in the same playthrough.

          • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            since when has obsidian ever had a game you can play after the ending?

            KOTOR you cant

            new vegas you cant (come on, even fo3 let you play after the ending)

            never finished outer worlds so im not sure on that

            • Gamma@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              FO3’s after-ending story play was added in a DLC, I remember one of the devs being surprised at how many people wanted to play in a post-story world

          • Primarily0617@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I don’t even mean I wouldn’t trust Obsidian. I mean I wouldn’t trust the specific team they had working on New Vegas, which was an absurdly stacked deck that they seemingly haven’t been able to re-create since.

            Films you can re-watch twice and have it be just as good the second time are rare. Bethesda wanted a film you could rewatch ten times while simultaneously larping as a cosmic god and trying to break everything you could.

            • ampersandrew@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              But this isn’t a film. People replay systems-driven games all the time, because you can tweak the variables and make it feel new. RPGs have done this plenty of times. Interacting with a separate quest line that occasionally intersects with things you did in one of your previous timelines is something that there is absolutely a way to do, and Obsidian has made exactly that type of systems-driven RPG plenty of times.

              • Primarily0617@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                if RPGs have done this plenty of times, then it’s not a new idea, and why are we talking about it in the context of the new ideas starfield had?

                people replay games for the gameplay. bethesda wanted a game you could replay for the story, and then have it still work as a story when the player deliberately sequence breaks everything because of their omniscience

                • ampersandrew@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  The thing that Obsidian has done plenty of times is system-driven reputations. The thing that would be new is bending that into new playthroughs on NG+ that interact with your past playthroughs.

                  • Primarily0617@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    how would your reputation carry over when nobody in the universe knows who you are? it sounds like you’re just inventing a new thing you have to grind

          • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah Bethesda really needs to pay some attention to Japanese games before they get anywhere near making an NG+ mechanic.

            The whole point of such a game is that they’re so rich in detail that it’s impossible to do everything and see everything in one playthrough. How do you miss that?

            • Ephera
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Maybe they could clear up with another critique, if they introduce a solid NG+: That you can be the hero of everyone and a ruthless murderer, a thief and the guy who stops the thieves etc…

              To some degree, I don’t want them to limit the player freedom here, because it is a role-playing game. Maybe you are role-playing as infiltrating the murderer guild. They can’t know.

              But having no interaction between the factions at all, just makes the world feel less credible. Ideally, they pull off the BG3 and allow you to role-play an infiltration, while also punching you into the face, if your cover is blown.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        All of the stories were like that in starfield. If I could sum it up it would be “jack of all trades, master of none”. Too much stuff crammed in and none of it fleshed out well enough.

        Base building was fun, until it was tedious because they only half automated the process.

        Ship building was fun, except you could only customize to a point.

        Exploration was fun, except they only made really 10ish buildings to just spawned them everywhere instead of generating custom ones (I fought at the same building at least 2 dozen times)

        With exploration, we want you to wander through giant spaces and planets, but give you no explorer or vehicle to use.

        We also want you to explore the galaxy fully immersed, but couldn’t solve the loading screen problem that yanks you out of the immersion.

        So so many cool ideas that you can tell the committee was just like “no, it’s not with finishing that, players will be fine with it”. The entire game feels like it was built by committee.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          And despite all that, just you watch if it’s not going to be a cool game once the modders really start going.

          Exact same thing happened with Skyrim, full of promise and ideas, half-assed execution. And look at it now.

      • Ephera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, I did mean astronomy. Stupid charlatans co-opting postfixes.

        I did not play Starfield; only watched some videos about it. Which is why I didn’t want to argue that it had no ideas, just that it’s overarching premise is incredibly mundane.

        But thinking about it now, I guess, even that is the case for their other games. Like, the actual Elder Scroll items are basically irrelevant. And ‘Fallout’ is just a generic postapocalyptic setting. Maybe it’s just that it’s a new series, so it hasn’t yet established an own identity, which gives the weak premise much more weight.

        Ultimately, they don’t want a strong premise, because it’s supposed to be sandbox-like. That’s what their fans want. But for answering why you should play specifically Starfield, when tons of space games exist which have done a better job at the space bits, it’s just not doing them any favors.

    • chaogomu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      The sad thing about Oblivion is that there are in-game books in Morrowind and previous games that describe the empire as being in the middle of a bamboo jungle. The vibe comes off as the Roman Empire in South East Asia.

      Instead we got generic high fantasy with the occasional guy wearing Roman armor.

      • Sordid@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        Eh, Bethesda flip-flop on that kind of stuff all the time. IIRC in Arena, the Imperial City was just in generic temperate woodland, then it was retconned in some in-game books to a jungle, then retconned again in Oblivion back to generic woodland. Same thing with the armor of imperial soldiers. Generic fantasy plate in early games, Roman in Morrowind, generic fantasy plate in Oblivion again, Roman again in Skyrim… They just can’t make up their minds.

        I will say this, though: It’s okay to retcon old lore, but only in order to make it more unique and interesting. Retconning stuff to make it more generic and bland is a high crime.

      • falcunculus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        This isn’t completely fair, Bethesda addressed the issue in universe and there are multiple authors arguing about this and why that is. It plays very well with the rest of the lore which is all about conflicting accounts and variety of interpretation.

        If I recall correctly the three in-universe theories are (1) it’s an error and there never was a jungle (2) there was a jungle but Talos CHIMed it away (3) there was a jungle when the high elves (Ayleids) lived there, but when the humans took over the white-gold tower changed the landscape to suit them.

        Unfortunately, /r/teslore has no fediverse equivalent that I know of so I wouldn’t know where to have this kind of discussion.

        • Ephera
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Well, this isn’t so much about how much sense it makes, but rather that they had a cool idea and then ignored it. They could have used their freedom of interpretation to build a really interesting setting and instead, they kind of just built Italy.