• smegforbrains
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      No you did not. You always addressed the point that we could build a long term storage facility. But these are not existant in Germany and as long as that’s the case we should not produce more nuclear waste. You did never address this point.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You can keep repeating that all you like. Anybody reading this thread can judge for themselves.

        • smegforbrains
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes, and I will: As long as there is no adequate long term storage facility we should not produce more nuclear waste. Maybe you can try addressing this argument instead of resorting to evasion or ad hominem fallacies.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            The fact that you keep pretending that your argument hasn’t been addressed is what makes this whole thing so hilarious.

            • smegforbrains
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Evasion fallacy again. No arguments given no valid points made.

                • smegforbrains
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Yes I will as long as you do not engage in a civil discussion, employ fallacies and do not offer arguments or sources to support your opinion.